HR289-119

In Committee

SAP Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jan 9, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The SAP Act amends the Agricultural Act of 2014's Acer access and development program for the maple industry. Beginning with the first request for applications at least one year after enactment, USDA must solicit input from maple industry stakeholders no later than six months before the request for applications and must consider that input when making grants. The bill also extends the program's authorization date from 2023 to 2030. The practical effect is to give maple producers, processors, researchers, and educators a formal consultation role in setting research and education priorities for Acer grants.

Who Benefits and How

Maple syrup producers benefit because USDA must solicit and consider their research and education priorities before awarding grants. Maple industry processors benefit from a longer authorization window and a consultation role in grant priorities. Acer program grant applicants benefit from clearer industry input before requests for applications are issued. Rural maple-producing communities benefit if grants support research, education, and market development through 2030.

Who Bears the Burden and How

USDA grant administrators must solicit stakeholder input at least six months before covered requests for applications. Maple industry stakeholders must organize and provide priorities early enough for USDA to consider them. Federal taxpayers bear the cost of any grants made under the extended program authorization. Competing specialty-crop priorities may receive less attention when Acer grants are shaped around maple stakeholder input.

Key Provisions

  • Extends the Acer access and development program authorization through 2030.
  • Requires USDA to solicit maple industry stakeholder input before covered grant requests for applications.
  • Requires USDA to consider stakeholder input when making Acer program grants.
  • Provides a consultation timeline of at least six months before the request for applications.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Extends the Acer access and development program through 2030 and requires USDA to consult maple industry stakeholders before grant requests for applications.

Key Policy Areas

Agriculture, Forestry, Rural Development

Primary Purpose

Extends the Acer access and development program through 2030 and requires USDA to consult maple industry stakeholders before grant requests for applications.

Policy Domains

Agriculture Forestry Rural Development

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Maple syrup producers
  • Maple industry processors
  • Acer program grant applicants
  • Rural maple-producing communities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Maple syrup producers:
Maple industry processors:
Acer program grant applicants:
Rural maple-producing communities:
Identified Costs
  • USDA grant administrators
  • Maple industry stakeholders
  • Federal taxpayers
  • Competing specialty-crop priorities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers:
USDA grant administrators:
Maple industry stakeholders:
Competing specialty-crop priorities:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 14, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.

Jan 9, 2025

Mr. Langworthy (for himself and Ms. Balint) introduced the following …

Jan 9, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

Jan 9, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Agriculture
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Acer program grant applicants, Maple syrup producers

Food & Beverage
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Maple industry processors

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

USDA grant administrators

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Taxpayers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Agriculture Forestry Rural Development

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology