HR2874-119

In Committee

Defense of Conscience in Health Care Act

119th Congress Introduced Apr 10, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Defense of Conscience in Health Care Act directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue, within six months after enactment, a final rule under federal conscience and anti-discrimination laws that is identical or materially equivalent to the former 45 CFR part 88 rule in effect on July 22, 2019. It also requires the new final rule to state that it supersedes any contrary rule in existence on the issuance date. The bill therefore hardwires a particular health care conscience-rights enforcement framework into HHS rulemaking, affecting providers and institutions that object to participating in certain services, HHS civil-rights staff, federally funded health care entities, and patients whose access may depend on how those refusals are handled.

Who Benefits and How

Health care workers with conscience objections benefit because HHS must restore a stronger federal rule protecting refusal rights. Religious health care institutions benefit because the restored part 88 framework supports institutional objections under federal conscience laws. Conscience-rights advocacy organizations benefit from a statutory deadline and supersession instruction for HHS rulemaking. HHS Office for Civil Rights staff benefit from a clear congressional directive to use the 2019 rule as the model.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Department of Health and Human Services must issue the final rule within six months and make it supersede contrary rules. Federally funded health care entities must update compliance policies to match the restored conscience-rights framework. Patients seeking contested services may face access barriers if providers or institutions invoke the restored refusal protections. State health regulators must account for federal preemption or supersession claims tied to the restored rule.

Key Provisions

  • Requires HHS to issue a final conscience-rights rule within six months.
  • Directs the rule to be identical or materially equivalent to the July 22, 2019 45 CFR part 88 rule.
  • Provides that the new rule supersedes contrary rules existing on the issuance date.
  • Uses the former rule's definition of federal conscience and anti-discrimination laws.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires HHS within six months to restore a rule materially equivalent to the July 22, 2019 federal health care conscience-rights regulation and make it supersede contrary rules.

Key Policy Areas

Health Care, Civil Rights, Administrative Law

Primary Purpose

Requires HHS within six months to restore a rule materially equivalent to the July 22, 2019 federal health care conscience-rights regulation and make it supersede contrary rules.

Policy Domains

Health Care Civil Rights Administrative Law

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Health care workers with conscience objections
  • Religious health care institutions
  • Conscience-rights advocacy organizations
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
HHS Office for Civil Rights staff:
Religious health care institutions:
Conscience-rights advocacy organizations:
Health care workers with conscience objections:
Identified Costs
  • Department of Health and Human Services
  • Federally funded health care entities
  • Patients seeking contested services
  • State health regulators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State health regulators:
Patients seeking contested services:
Federally funded health care entities:
Department of Health and Human Services:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 10, 2025

Mr. Moolenaar introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Apr 10, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Apr 10, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Healthcare
3 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -2 negative

Federally funded health care entities, Patients seeking contested services, Religious health care institutions

Positive-direction: Religious health care institutions

Negative-direction: Federally funded health care entities, Patients seeking contested services

Health Care Providers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Health care workers with conscience objections

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Department of Health and Human Services

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Health Care Civil Rights Administrative Law

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology