HR281-119

Reported

Grizzly Bear State Management Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 9, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Grizzly Bear State Management Act directs the Secretary of the Interior to reissue the 2017 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service final rule that removed the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem grizzly bear population from the federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife. The Secretary must do so within 180 days after enactment. The bill says the reissuance happens without regard to any other provision of law that applies to issuing that final rule, and it makes the reissued rule and the bill section not subject to judicial review.

Who Benefits and How

State wildlife management agencies in Montana, Wyoming, and Idaho benefit because delisting would shift more management authority from federal ESA control to state wildlife systems. Ranchers in the Greater Yellowstone region benefit from potentially broader state tools for managing conflicts with grizzly bears. Livestock producers in the Greater Yellowstone region benefit for the same reason. Hunting outfitters and hunting guides benefit if state management eventually allows more hunting or conflict-management opportunities. Landowners near grizzly habitat benefit from reduced federal litigation and regulatory uncertainty.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service must reissue the 2017 rule within 180 days and loses ordinary discretion over the rulemaking process. Environmental advocacy groups and conservation advocacy groups lose judicial-review avenues to challenge the reissued delisting rule. The Greater Yellowstone grizzly bear population may face increased management risk if federal threatened-species protections are removed. Federal courts are barred from reviewing the reissuance.

Key Provisions

  • Requires reissuance of the 2017 final rule removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem grizzly bear population from the federal threatened-species list.
  • Directs the Secretary of the Interior to reissue the rule within 180 days after enactment.
  • Provides that the reissuance occurs without regard to other laws that would otherwise apply to issuing the final rule.
  • Bars judicial review of the reissued rule and the statutory reissuance section.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the Secretary of the Interior to reissue within 180 days the 2017 final rule removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem grizzly bear population from the federal threatened-species list, directs reissuance without regard to other laws that would otherwise apply, and bars judicial review of the reissued rule.

Key Policy Areas

Wildlife, Public Lands, State Management, Judicial Review

Primary Purpose

Requires the Secretary of the Interior to reissue within 180 days the 2017 final rule removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem grizzly bear population from the federal threatened-species list, directs reissuance without regard to other laws that would otherwise apply, and bars judicial review of the reissued rule.

Policy Domains

Wildlife Public Lands State Management Judicial Review

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Montana Wildlife Management Agency
  • Wyoming Wildlife Management Agency
  • Idaho Wildlife Management Agency
  • Rancher landowners in the Greater Yellowstone region
  • Livestock producer employers in the Greater Yellowstone region
  • Hunting guide workers
  • Landowners near grizzly habitat
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Hunting guide workers: ,
Landowners near grizzly habitat: ,
Idaho Wildlife Management Agency: ,
Montana Wildlife Management Agency: ,
Wyoming Wildlife Management Agency: ,
Rancher landowners in the Greater Yellowstone region: ,
Livestock producer employers in the Greater Yellowstone region: ,
Identified Costs
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • Environmental advocacy organizations
  • Conservation advocacy organizations
  • Greater Yellowstone grizzly bear population
  • Federal courts
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Federal courts: ,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: ,
Conservation advocacy organizations: ,
Environmental advocacy organizations: ,
Greater Yellowstone grizzly bear population: ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Oct 3, 2025

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Oct 3, 2025

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 281.

Oct 3, 2025

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. …

Jul 15, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jul 15, 2025

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute …

Jan 9, 2025

Introduced in House

Jan 9, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Jan 9, 2025

Ms. Hageman (for herself, Mr. Zinke, Mr. Fulcher, Mr. Stauber, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Wildlife
15 mentions across 3 clauses
+9 positive -6 negative

Greater Yellowstone grizzly bear population, Idaho wildlife management agency, Montana wildlife management agency

Positive-direction: Idaho wildlife management agency, Montana wildlife management agency, Wyoming wildlife management agency

Negative-direction: Greater Yellowstone grizzly bear population, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Agriculture
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+6 positive

Livestock producers in the Greater Yellowstone region, Ranchers in the Greater Yellowstone region

Environment
6 mentions across 3 clauses
-6 negative

Conservation advocacy groups, Environmental advocacy groups

Outdoor Recreation
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Hunting outfitters

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
?3 uncertain

Federal courts

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Wildlife Public Lands State Management Judicial Review
Actor Mappings
"fws"
→ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
"interior"
→ Secretary of the Interior

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology