HR2756-119

In Committee

National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Apr 9, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The National Biotechnology Initiative Act turns biotechnology coordination into a standing federal initiative. It names participating agencies including Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, HHS, Homeland Security, Interior, State, EPA, NASA, NSF, ODNI, and USTR. It creates a National Biotechnology Coordination Office in the Executive Office of the President within 180 days, led by a presidentially appointed director, and uses an interagency committee of Assistant Secretary-level agency representatives. The Office must coordinate strategy, spending, biological data policy, biosecurity, regulatory pathways, workforce development, commercialization, international partnerships, a public website, annual reports, five-year national strategies, and GAO reviews. NSF is authorized $22 million for FY2026, $35 million for FY2027, and $25 million for each of FY2028 through FY2030 to support the Office.

Who Benefits and How

Biotechnology companies benefit from coordinated regulatory pathways, commercialization support, testbeds, and market-access diplomacy. Biotechnology researchers benefit from sustained federal R&D support, biological-data infrastructure, joint solicitations, and public-private research centers. National security agencies benefit from a coordinated framework for biosecurity threats, adversary investments, biological data risks, and supply-chain vulnerabilities. Biotechnology workers benefit from a national workforce framework, training programs, fellowships, and curriculum support.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Participating federal agencies must designate biotechnology leads, join subcommittees, share information, and implement national strategy duties. The National Science Foundation must provide staffing, compensation authority, and administrative support for the coordination office. The National Biotechnology Coordination Office must maintain the website, annual reporting, strategies, regulatory-pathway work, and interagency coordination. Biotechnology regulators must negotiate clearer pathways and resolve overlaps, gaps, and ambiguities across agencies.

Key Provisions

  • Establishes a National Biotechnology Initiative across named federal agencies.
  • Creates a National Biotechnology Coordination Office in the Executive Office of the President within 180 days.
  • Authorizes NSF support of $22 million in FY2026, $35 million in FY2027, and $25 million in each of FY2028 through FY2030.
  • Requires a public biotechnology website, annual reports, five-year national strategies, and recurring GAO reviews.
  • Directs participating agencies to act on national security, data, commercialization, regulatory streamlining, biosafety, workforce, bioliteracy, and international partnerships.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Establishes a National Biotechnology Initiative, a National Biotechnology Coordination Office in the Executive Office of the President, an interagency committee, public biotechnology website, strategies, reports, GAO reviews, and agency duties across security, data, commercialization, regulation, workforce, and international engagement.

Key Policy Areas

Science, Biotechnology, National Security, Industrial Policy

Primary Purpose

Establishes a National Biotechnology Initiative, a National Biotechnology Coordination Office in the Executive Office of the President, an interagency committee, public biotechnology website, strategies, reports, GAO reviews, and agency duties across security, data, commercialization, regulation, workforce, and international engagement.

Policy Domains

Science Biotechnology National Security Industrial Policy

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Biotechnology companies
  • Biotechnology researchers
  • National security agencies
  • Biotechnology workers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Biotechnology workers: , , ,
Biotechnology companies: , , ,
Biotechnology researchers: , , ,
National security agencies: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Participating federal agencies
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Biotechnology Coordination Office
  • Biotechnology regulators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Biotechnology regulators: , , ,
National Science Foundation: , , ,
Participating federal agencies: , , ,
National Biotechnology Coordination Office: , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 9, 2025

Mrs. Bice (for herself and Mr. Khanna) introduced the following …

Apr 9, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and …

Apr 9, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
10 mentions across 5 clauses
-10 negative

National Biotechnology Coordination Office, National Science Foundation

Pharmaceuticals
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

Biotechnology companies

Research & Science
5 mentions across 5 clauses
?5 uncertain

Biotechnology researchers

Defense
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

National security agencies

5/6
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Science Biotechnology National Security Industrial Policy

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology