HR2640-118

Reported

To provide for reform of the asylum system and protection of the border.

118th Congress Introduced Apr 17, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

Reforms asylum system by denying eligibility to migrants who transit third countries without applying there first. Expands safe third country provisions and reduces asylum access.

Who Benefits and How

  • Border security gains reduced asylum claims at southern border
  • Immigration enforcement receives clearer denial authorities
  • Transit countries may see more asylum applications filed there

Who Bears the Burden and How

  • Asylum seekers must apply in transit countries first
  • Trafficking victims receive narrow exception
  • Migrants face higher bars to U.S. protection

Key Provisions

  • Denies asylum if transited third country without applying there
  • Expands safe third country to case-by-case determinations
  • Exception for trafficking victims and denied applications elsewhere
  • No bilateral agreement required for safe third country

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Comprehensive asylum reform requiring transit country applications and safe third country provisions

Who Benefits

  • Border security
  • Immigration enforcement
  • Transit countries

Who Bears Costs

  • Asylum seekers
  • Trafficking victims
  • Migrants

Key Policy Areas

Immigration, Border Security, Asylum

Primary Purpose

Comprehensive asylum reform requiring transit country applications and safe third country provisions

Policy Domains

Immigration Border Security Asylum

Legislative Strategy

"Restrict asylum access through third country transit requirements"

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
May 5, 2023

Additional sponsor: Mrs. Lesko

May 5, 2023

Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary with an amendment

May 5, 2023

Committees on Ways and Means, Education and the Workforce, and …

Apr 17, 2023

Mr. McClintock (for himself and Mr. Biggs) introduced the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Border Security
77 mentions across 61 clauses
+34 positive -39 negative ?4 uncertain

Asylum adjudicators, Border and asylum screening officers, Customs and Border Protection officers

Asylum adjudicators, Border and asylum screening officers, Customs and Border Protection officers, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Homeland Security and Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security asylum officers, Department of Homeland Security family detention operations, Department of Homeland Security parole officials, Department of Homeland Security verification programs, Department of Justice immigration courts, Federal immigration enforcement agencies, Federal immigration prosecutors and enforcement agencies, Immigration courts and asylum adjudicators, Immigration enforcement agencies, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services face effects in multiple directions

Immigrant Communities
62 mentions across 62 clauses
+22 positive -40 negative

Asylum applicants, Asylum applicants outside the exceptions, Asylum applicants seeking work authorization

Asylum applicants, Asylum applicants outside the exceptions, Asylum applicants seeking work authorization, Asylum applicants subject to special procedures, Asylum seekers in expedited removal, Asylum seekers who transited third countries, Document fraud participants, Migrants applying for admission, Migrants entering or present unlawfully, Migrants receiving parole, Migrants seeking parole into the United States, Unauthorized workers, Unauthorized workers using invalid Social Security numbers, Workers using fraudulent documents face effects in multiple directions

Government
31 mentions across 26 clauses
+7 positive -22 negative ?2 uncertain

Attorney General and DOJ immigration courts, Congressional oversight committees, DHS parole program administrators

Congressional oversight committees, Department of Homeland Security and Department of Agriculture, Social Security Administration, Social Security Administration Inspector General, Social Security Administration and DHS face effects in multiple directions

All Businesses
23 mentions across 23 clauses
+8 positive -12 negative ?3 uncertain

Employers, Employers hiring asylum applicants, Employers participating in pilot programs

Employers, Employers hiring asylum applicants, Employers participating in pilot programs, Employers using E-Verify photo matching, Employers using employment eligibility verification, Employers violating employment eligibility rules face effects in multiple directions

Immigration
13 mentions across 13 clauses
+1 positive -11 negative ?1 uncertain

Asylum applicants seeking work authorization, Asylum seekers at credible fear interviews, Asylum seekers at ports of entry

Positive-direction: Asylum seekers from Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela

Negative-direction: Asylum applicants seeking work authorization, Asylum seekers at credible fear interviews, Asylum seekers at ports of entry, Asylum seekers claiming particular social group membership, Asylum seekers who transited through third countries, Asylum seekers with criminal records, Immigrant families with children, Immigrants seeking humanitarian parole, Unaccompanied minors seeking special immigrant status, Undocumented immigrants and visa overstayers

Labor
12 mentions across 11 clauses
+3 positive -9 negative

H-2A agricultural workers, H-2A temporary agricultural workers, Identity fraud victims

Identity fraud victims, Identity theft victims and lawful workers face effects in multiple directions

State & Local Government
11 mentions across 11 clauses
+7 positive -3 negative ?1 uncertain

State and local governments, State governments regulating unauthorized employment, States and local governments challenging Federal immigration parole

State governments regulating unauthorized employment, States and local governments challenging Federal immigration parole, States challenging immigration parole use face effects in multiple directions

Immigrant Families
9 mentions across 9 clauses
+3 positive -5 negative ?1 uncertain

Immigrant children seeking special immigrant juvenile status, Migrant families with children, Unaccompanied immigrant children

Immigrant children seeking special immigrant juvenile status, Migrant families with children, Unaccompanied immigrant children face effects in multiple directions

46/46
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Asylum
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Homeland Security
"attorney_general"
→ Attorney General

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology