Drug Testing for Special Government Employees Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Drug Testing for Special Government Employees Act imposes a drug-testing rule on special Government employees in sensitive positions. Before a proposed special Government employee begins service at an agency, the agency head must require a drug test under the Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs. Within 90 days of enactment, each agency head must enter every current special Government employee in a sensitive position into a random drug testing program under the same guidelines. A positive pre-service test makes the individual ineligible for appointment as a special Government employee for at least 12 months. A positive random test for a current special Government employee requires removal from the civil service and at least 12 months of appointment ineligibility. The bill defines agency to include the Executive Office of the President and Office of Management and Budget, and defines sensitive positions to include classified access, safety, security, national security, high-trust functions, mission-critical positions, and mission-critical duties.
Who Benefits and How
Federal agencies benefit from a clearer drug-screening requirement for special Government employees who have classified access, security duties, or mission-critical responsibilities. National security offices benefit because special Government employees in sensitive positions are placed into random testing programs within 90 days. Members of the public benefit indirectly if sensitive federal functions are staffed by people who pass mandatory drug testing. Agency security managers benefit from a statutory basis for appointment ineligibility and civil-service removal after positive tests.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Proposed special Government employees must pass a drug test before their first day of service at an agency. Current special Government employees in sensitive positions must enter random drug testing programs within 90 days. Agency heads must implement testing, determine positive results, remove current employees after positive tests, and enforce 12-month appointment bans. Individuals testing positive lose appointment eligibility for at least 12 months and current employees are removed from the civil service.
Key Provisions
- Requires pre-service drug testing for proposed special Government employees at agencies.
- Requires random drug testing within 90 days for current special Government employees in sensitive positions.
- Bars appointment for at least 12 months after a positive pre-service test.
- Requires civil-service removal and at least 12 months of appointment ineligibility after a positive random test.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires proposed special Government employees and current special Government employees in sensitive positions to undergo drug testing, with positive tests causing appointment ineligibility, civil-service removal, and at least 12 months of ineligibility for special Government employee appointment.
Key Policy Areas
Federal Workforce, Drug Testing, National Security
Primary Purpose
Requires proposed special Government employees and current special Government employees in sensitive positions to undergo drug testing, with positive tests causing appointment ineligibility, civil-service removal, and at least 12 months of ineligibility for special Government employee appointment.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Federal agencies
- National security offices
- Members of the public
- Agency security managers
Identified Costs
- Proposed special Government employees
- Current special Government employees
- Agency heads
- Individuals testing positive
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMs. Sherrill introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Agency heads, Federal agencies, National security offices
Positive-direction: Federal agencies, National security offices
Negative-direction: Agency heads
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology