To require that in a notice of proposed rulemaking for a new rule, the notice shall identify three rules which the agency intends to repeal.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill requires requirement to repeal three rules before making a new rule Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— in paragraph (2), by striking and at the end; in paragraph (3), by striking the period. It relies on definition changes and compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Regulated Industries.
Who Benefits and How
Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Requires requirement to repeal three rules before making a new rule Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— in paragraph (2), by striking and at the end; in paragraph (3), by striking the period...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill requires requirement to repeal three rules before making a new rule Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— in paragraph (2), by striking and at the end; in paragraph (3), by striking the period.
Key Policy Areas
Regulated Industries
Primary Purpose
The bill requires requirement to repeal three rules before making a new rule Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— in paragraph (2), by striking and at the end; in paragraph (3), by striking the period.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Posey introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology