HR2470-119

In Committee

COST of Relocations Act

119th Congress Introduced Mar 27, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The COST of Relocations Act creates a pre-relocation review regime for significant federal agency moves and administrative redelegations. Before a covered relocation involving more than the lesser of 5 percent or 100 employees, the agency must conduct a benefit-cost analysis consistent with OMB Circular A-4 guidance, give an unredacted report to its inspector general, and wait for inspector general review and congressional reporting. Required content includes quantified outcomes, metrics, stakeholder effects, employee engagement plans, implementation timelines, staffing and financial needs, risk assessments, mission effects, and National Capital Region real estate comparisons when relevant. Public reports must omit proprietary, trade-secret, and confidential information.

Who Benefits and How

Federal employees affected by large relocations benefit because agencies must analyze commuting-area moves, engagement plans, mission effects, and stakeholder impacts before acting. Congressional oversight committees benefit from inspector general reports with data, assumptions, conclusions, and assessments of whether federal funds are justified. Communities served by relocating agency positions benefit from required analysis of service impacts and stakeholder effects. Federal taxpayers benefit if weak or politically motivated relocations are blocked or improved before money is spent.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal agencies planning large relocations must complete benefit-cost analyses, employee engagement plans, risk mitigation plans, and public reports before proceeding. Agency inspectors general must review unredacted relocation analyses and report to Congress within 90 days. Administration officials lose flexibility to move positions quickly without documenting benefits, costs, mission risks, and real estate alternatives. Destination communities seeking relocated federal jobs may face delays while agencies complete the required analyses and reviews.

Key Provisions

  • Bars covered federal agency relocations unless the agency first completes a benefit-cost analysis and submits it to the agency inspector general.
  • Requires the analysis to follow OMB Circular A-4 economic and social science principles.
  • Mandates public agency reports and 90-day inspector general reports to Senate and House oversight committees.
  • Defines covered relocations as large redelegations or moves affecting more than the lesser of 5 percent or 100 agency employees.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires federal agencies to complete OMB Circular A-4 benefit-cost analyses, inspector general review, public reporting, and congressional reporting before carrying out major agency relocations or redelegations of functions.

Key Policy Areas

Government Operations, Federal Workforce, Oversight

Primary Purpose

Requires federal agencies to complete OMB Circular A-4 benefit-cost analyses, inspector general review, public reporting, and congressional reporting before carrying out major agency relocations or redelegations of functions.

Policy Domains

Government Operations Federal Workforce Oversight

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Federal employees affected by relocations
  • Congressional oversight committees
  • Communities served by agency offices
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers:
Congressional oversight committees:
Communities served by agency offices:
Federal employees affected by relocations:
Identified Costs
  • Federal agencies planning relocations
  • Agency inspectors general
  • Administration relocation officials
  • Destination communities seeking federal jobs
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Agency inspectors general:
Administration relocation officials:
Federal agencies planning relocations:
Destination communities seeking federal jobs:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 27, 2025

Mr. Subramanyam (for himself, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Carson, Mr. Connolly, …

Mar 27, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Mar 27, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -2 negative

Agency inspectors general, Congressional oversight committees, Federal agencies planning relocations

Positive-direction: Congressional oversight committees

Negative-direction: Agency inspectors general, Federal agencies planning relocations

Government Employees
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Federal employees affected by relocations

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Government Operations Federal Workforce Oversight

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology