HR2456-119

Introduced

To terminate the Department of Education, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Mar 27, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

This bill terminates the Department of Education effective October 1, 2026, and redistributes its functions across multiple federal agencies. A new Office of Education would be created within HHS. Key programs transfer to HHS, NSF, Treasury, Defense, Labor, and Interior. Title I funding ends after 2036 and new PLUS Loans end after October 2026. The Institute of Education Sciences goes to HHS and the Office for Civil Rights goes to DOJ.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Terminate the Department of Education effective October 1, 2026, transfer its functions to other federal agencies, create a new Office of Education within HHS, and phase out certain education programs and federal student loan authorities

Who Benefits

  • State and local education authorities
  • Private education providers
  • Proponents of decentralized education governance

Who Bears Costs

  • Department of Education employees
  • Students dependent on Federal Direct PLUS Loans
  • Title I schools

Key Policy Areas

Education, Government Operations

Primary Purpose

Terminate the Department of Education effective October 1, 2026, transfer its functions to other federal agencies, create a new Office of Education within HHS, and phase out certain education programs and federal student loan authorities

Policy Domains

Education Government Operations

Legislative Strategy

"Eliminate the Department of Education by distributing its functions across HHS, Treasury, Defense, Labor, NSF, BIE, and DOJ, while phasing out some programs entirely"

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 27, 2025

Mr. Moran introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
9 mentions across 6 clauses
+3 positive -5 negative ?1 uncertain

Department of Education, Department of Education employees, Department of Health and Human Services

Positive-direction: HHS Office of Education staff, New Office of Education leadership, Parties to existing Department of Education proceedings

Negative-direction: Department of Education, Department of Education employees, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Treasury Department

Education
9 mentions across 5 clauses
+2 positive -7 negative

Graduate students relying on PLUS Loans, Grant recipients under transferred programs, HBCUs and minority-serving institutions

Positive-direction: Grant recipients under transferred programs, State and local education agencies

Negative-direction: Graduate students relying on PLUS Loans, HBCUs and minority-serving institutions, Parents of undergraduate students, Students in neglected/delinquent institutions, Students with disabilities (IDEA recipients), Title I schools, Title I schools serving low-income students

Financial Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Private student lenders

9/15
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Education Government Operations
Actor Mappings
"the_director"
→ Director of Education
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Health and Human Services
Domains
Government Operations
Actor Mappings
"the_president"
→ President
"secretary_of_education"
→ Secretary of Education
Domains
Education Government Operations
Domains
Education Finance
Domains
Government Operations

Note: The Secretary in Section 4 refers to Secretary of Education, while in Section 3 the Secretary refers to Secretary of HHS

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"function" §14

Includes any duty, obligation, power, authority, responsibility, right, privilege, activity, or program

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology