HR2449-119

Passed House

To direct the Federal Communications Commission to establish a task force to be known as the 6G Task Force, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Mar 27, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The FUTURE Networks Act directs the Federal Communications Commission to create a 6G Task Force within 120 days after enactment. The FCC Chair must appoint representatives from the communications industry, public-interest organizations or academic institutions, and federal, state, local, and tribal governments, while excluding companies, organizations, or institutions the Chair determines are controlled by or subject to influence from a foreign adversary or otherwise present a national-security threat. Within one year, the Task Force must report on the status of 6G standards-setting, possible 6G uses, supply-chain and cybersecurity limitations, and coordination across federal, state, local, and tribal governments for siting, deployment, and adoption. The Task Force also must publish draft findings in the Federal Register and on the FCC website at least 180 days before the final report goes to the House Energy and Commerce Committee and Senate Commerce Committee.

Who Benefits and How

Trusted wireless carriers, domestic communications-equipment developers, academic wireless researchers, public-interest technology organizations, state broadband offices, local permitting agencies, tribal telecommunications officials, House Commerce Committee staff, and Senate Commerce Committee staff benefit because the bill gives them a formal advisory channel, public draft findings, and a report on how 6G deployment could be coordinated without advantaging untrusted foreign-adversary suppliers.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Federal Communications Commission, the FCC Chair, FCC public-notice staff, 6G Task Force members, federal agencies participating in deployment coordination, state governments, local governments, tribal governments, and foreign-adversary-controlled communications companies bear the burden because the FCC must appoint and manage the Task Force, screen participants, publish draft findings, receive public comments, produce the final report, and exclude not-trusted entities from the advisory process.

Key Provisions

  • Requires the FCC to establish a 6G Task Force within 120 days after enactment.
  • Requires the FCC Chair to appoint communications-industry, public-interest, academic, federal, state, local, and tribal representatives.
  • Bars participation by entities the Chair finds controlled by a foreign adversary or otherwise not trusted.
  • Requires draft findings to be published in the Federal Register and on the FCC website 180 days before the final report.
  • Requires a congressional report on 6G standards, possible uses, supply-chain and cybersecurity limits, and deployment coordination.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the Federal Communications Commission to establish a 6G Task Force within 120 days, appoint trusted communications, public-interest, academic, federal, state, local, and tribal representatives, publish draft findings for comment, and report to Congress on 6G standards, uses, limitations, and deployment coordination.

Key Policy Areas

Telecommunications, Technology, Government Oversight

Primary Purpose

Requires the Federal Communications Commission to establish a 6G Task Force within 120 days, appoint trusted communications, public-interest, academic, federal, state, local, and tribal representatives, publish draft findings for comment, and report to Congress on 6G standards, uses, limitations, and deployment coordination.

Policy Domains

Telecommunications Technology Government Oversight

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Trusted wireless carriers
  • Domestic communications-equipment developers
  • Academic wireless researchers
  • Public-interest technology organizations
  • State broadband offices
  • Local permitting agencies
  • Tribal telecommunications officials
  • House Commerce Committee staff
  • Senate Commerce Committee staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State broadband offices:
Local permitting agencies:
Trusted wireless carriers:
Academic wireless researchers:
House Commerce Committee staff:
Senate Commerce Committee staff:
Tribal telecommunications officials:
Public-interest technology organizations:
Domestic communications-equipment developers:
Identified Costs
  • Federal Communications Commission
  • FCC Chair
  • FCC public-notice staff
  • 6G Task Force members
  • Federal agencies participating in deployment coordination
  • State governments
  • Local governments
  • Tribal governments
  • Foreign-adversary-controlled communications companies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
FCC Chair:
Local governments:
State governments:
Tribal governments:
6G Task Force members:
FCC public-notice staff:
Federal Communications Commission:
Foreign-adversary-controlled communications companies:
Federal agencies participating in deployment coordination:

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 29, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, …

Apr 29, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Apr 24, 2025

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the …

Mar 27, 2025

Ms. Matsui (for herself, Mr. Allen, and Mr. Walberg) introduced …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
?3 uncertain

Local permitting agencies, State broadband offices, Tribal telecommunications officials

Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

FCC Chair, Federal Communications Commission

Telecommunications
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

Foreign-adversary-controlled communications companies, Trusted wireless carriers

Positive-direction: Trusted wireless carriers

Negative-direction: Foreign-adversary-controlled communications companies

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Domestic communications-equipment developers

Education
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Academic wireless researchers

Nonprofits
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Public-interest technology organizations

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Telecommunications Technology Government Oversight
Actor Mappings
"chair"
→ FCC Chair
"commission"
→ Federal Communications Commission
"task_force"
→ 6G Task Force

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology