HR2444-119

Passed House

Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Mar 27, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025 assigns new responsibilities to the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis. The Assistant Secretary must promote stable and resilient critical supply chains and critical and emerging technologies, lead a Supply Chain Resilience Working Group, consult covered nongovernmental representatives, industry, higher education, and state and local governments, encourage U.S. production of emerging technologies, assess supply-chain resilience, support critical goods from domestic manufacturers and allied or key partner nations, improve flexible U.S. manufacturing capacity, reduce reliance on critical goods from countries described in the act, and encourage relocation of critical-goods manufacturing to the United States or allied countries.

Who Benefits and How

Domestic manufacturers, critical-goods producers, critical and emerging technology companies, allied-country manufacturers, key partner-nation manufacturers, manufacturing workers, state and local economic-development officials, institutions of higher education, supply-chain risk assessment vendors, Congress, and national-security planners benefit from federal mapping of vulnerabilities, modeling of shocks, assessments of demand and supply, workforce analysis, consultation, and a stronger policy push toward domestic and trusted-source production.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis, Department of Commerce offices and bureaus, Supply Chain Resilience Working Group agencies, covered nongovernmental representatives, data and modeling staff, Commerce report writers, federal procurement and trade staff, domestic enterprises relying on covered-country suppliers, and manufacturers in disfavored countries must participate in assessments, provide information, evaluate relocation and sourcing alternatives, absorb coordination work, operate without new authorized funds, and plan around a 10-year sunset.

Key Provisions

  • Adds supply-chain resilience, critical-goods availability, domestic manufacturing, allied sourcing, and relocation duties to the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis.
  • Establishes a Supply Chain Resilience Working Group within 120 days.
  • Requires mapping, modeling, gap identification, shock analysis, workforce analysis, risk-tool identification, and assessments of domestic and allied manufacturing capacity.
  • Requires a Department of Commerce capability assessment and implementation strategy within two years.
  • Prohibits additional authorized funds for the title.
  • Terminates the title and its requirements 10 years after enactment.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Expands Commerce Department supply-chain resilience duties, creates a Supply Chain Resilience Working Group to map and model critical supply chains and shocks, requires a Commerce capability assessment and implementation strategy, supports domestic and allied critical-goods production, and sunsets the title after 10 years without authorizing extra funds.

Key Policy Areas

Manufacturing, National Security, Technology

Primary Purpose

Expands Commerce Department supply-chain resilience duties, creates a Supply Chain Resilience Working Group to map and model critical supply chains and shocks, requires a Commerce capability assessment and implementation strategy, supports domestic and allied critical-goods production, and sunsets the title after 10 years without authorizing extra funds.

Policy Domains

Manufacturing National Security Technology

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Domestic manufacturers
  • Critical-goods producers
  • Critical and emerging technology companies
  • Allied-country manufacturers
  • Key partner-nation manufacturers
  • Manufacturing workers
  • State and local economic-development officials
  • Supply-chain risk assessment vendors
  • Congress
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Congress: , , , ,
Manufacturing workers: , , , ,
Domestic manufacturers: , , , ,
Critical-goods producers: , , , ,
Allied-country manufacturers: , , , ,
Key partner-nation manufacturers: , , , ,
Supply-chain risk assessment vendors: , , , ,
Critical and emerging technology companies: , , , ,
State and local economic-development officials: , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis
  • Department of Commerce offices and bureaus
  • Supply Chain Resilience Working Group agencies
  • Covered nongovernmental representatives
  • Data and modeling staff
  • Commerce report writers
  • Domestic enterprises relying on covered-country suppliers
  • Manufacturers in disfavored countries
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Commerce report writers: , , , ,
Data and modeling staff: , , , ,
Manufacturers in disfavored countries: , , , ,
Covered nongovernmental representatives: , , , ,
Department of Commerce offices and bureaus: , , , ,
Supply Chain Resilience Working Group agencies: , , , ,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis: , , , ,
Domestic enterprises relying on covered-country suppliers: , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 29, 2025

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

Apr 29, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Apr 29, 2025

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative …

Apr 28, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Apr 28, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill …

Apr 28, 2025

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …

Apr 28, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …

Apr 28, 2025

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1653-1657)

Apr 28, 2025

Mr. Bilirakis moved to suspend the rules and pass the …

Apr 24, 2025

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 45.

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
9 mentions across 5 clauses
+3 positive -6 negative

Commerce Industry Analysis Assistant Secretary, Commerce report writers, Congressional commerce committees

Commerce Industry Analysis Assistant Secretary, Supply Chain Resilience Working Group agencies face effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Congressional commerce committees

Negative-direction: Commerce report writers, Department of Commerce offices and bureaus

Manufacturing
8 mentions across 3 clauses
+6 positive -1 negative ~1 mixed

Allied-country manufacturers, Critical supply chain industries, Critical-goods producers

Positive-direction: Allied-country manufacturers, Critical-goods producers, Domestic manufacturers, Manufacturing workers

Negative-direction: Manufacturers in disfavored countries

Technology
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Critical and emerging technology companies, Supply-chain risk assessment vendors

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
~1 mixed

Covered nongovernmental representatives

5/7
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Manufacturing National Security Technology
Actor Mappings
"working_group"
→ Supply Chain Resilience Working Group
"assistant_secretary"
→ Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology