HR2392-119

Reported

To provide for the regulation of payment stablecoins, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Mar 26, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The STABLE Act of 2025 builds a detailed federal framework for dollar-denominated payment stablecoins. It bars anyone other than a permitted payment stablecoin issuer from issuing a U.S. payment stablecoin and, after a transition period, bars custodial intermediaries from offering stablecoins that were not issued by permitted issuers. Permitted issuers must keep at least 1-to-1 reserves in cash, demand deposits, insured-credit-union share drafts, short Treasury securities, repurchase agreements, central-bank reserves, or similarly approved foreign assets; publish monthly reserve reports; redeem stablecoins at par; and avoid pledging or rehypothecating reserves except under narrow liquidity-management rules. The bill gives approval, supervision, examination, and enforcement roles to the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and State payment-stablecoin regulators.

Who Benefits and How

Permitted payment stablecoin issuers benefit from a clear legal route to issue payment stablecoins once they satisfy application, reserve, redemption, and reporting standards. Depository institutions, national banks, Federal credit unions, State credit unions, and trust companies benefit because the bill confirms they may accept deposits, issue deposit-backed digital assets, use distributed ledgers for records and intrabank transfers, and provide custody services when otherwise allowed by law. Payment stablecoin holders benefit from reserve segregation, par redemption duties, monthly public reserve disclosures, customer-property protections, and a two-year moratorium on new endogenously collateralized stablecoins. Foreign issuers in comparable regulatory regimes benefit from a path to U.S. access if Treasury finds their home regime comparable and they consent to U.S. reporting and examination.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Unlicensed stablecoin issuers must leave the U.S. issuance market or obtain permitted status. Custodial stablecoin intermediaries must police whether offered stablecoins are issued by permitted issuers after the transition period. Permitted issuers must hold narrow reserve assets, file applications, publish monthly reserve certifications, comply with Bank Secrecy Act rules, submit reports, face examination, and maintain customer-property segregation. Federal and State payment-stablecoin regulators must review applications, share supervisory information, write rules, examine nonbank issuers, report rulemaking status to Congress, study non-payment stablecoins, and coordinate interoperability standards with the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Key Provisions

  • Bars non-permitted persons from issuing payment stablecoins in the United States and bars custodial intermediaries from offering non-permitted stablecoins after the transition period.
  • Requires permitted issuers to maintain at least 1-to-1 reserves in specified high-quality liquid assets and publish monthly reserve disclosures.
  • Establishes application review, supervision, examination, enforcement, reporting, and revocation procedures for bank-subsidiary and nonbank stablecoin issuers.
  • Provides State qualified issuer supervision while preserving Federal backup authority and information sharing with Federal regulators.
  • Requires custodians and safekeeping providers to segregate stablecoins, reserves, and private keys as customer property.
  • Directs regulators to assess interoperability standards with NIST and pursue comparable-regime agreements with foreign jurisdictions.
  • Prohibits new endogenously collateralized stablecoins for two years.
  • Clarifies that permitted payment stablecoins are not securities under the Securities Act, Exchange Act, Investment Advisers Act, or Investment Company Act.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a federal payment-stablecoin regime by limiting issuance to permitted bank subsidiaries, approved nonbank subsidiaries, State qualified issuers, and comparable foreign issuers, while imposing 1-to-1 reserve backing, redemption, disclosure, custody, supervision, enforcement, interoperability, and securities-law classification rules.

Key Policy Areas

Financial Services, Banking, Digital Assets, Consumer Protection

Primary Purpose

Creates a federal payment-stablecoin regime by limiting issuance to permitted bank subsidiaries, approved nonbank subsidiaries, State qualified issuers, and comparable foreign issuers, while imposing 1-to-1 reserve backing, redemption, disclosure, custody, supervision, enforcement, interoperability, and securities-law classification rules.

Policy Domains

Financial Services Banking Digital Assets Consumer Protection

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Payment stablecoin consumers
  • Depository institution providers
  • Federal credit unions
  • State credit unions
  • Trust company custody providers
  • Comparable-regime foreign issuer companies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
State credit unions: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Federal credit unions: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Payment stablecoin consumers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Trust company custody providers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Depository institution providers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comparable-regime foreign issuer companies: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
  • Federal Reserve Board
  • National Credit Union Administration
  • Securities and Exchange Commission
  • State payment stablecoin agencies
  • Stablecoin custody service providers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Federal Reserve Board: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
State payment stablecoin agencies: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Securities and Exchange Commission: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
National Credit Union Administration: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Stablecoin custody service providers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
May 6, 2025

Additional sponsors: Mr. Timmons, Mr. Lawler, Mr. Nunn of Iowa, …

May 6, 2025

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Mar 26, 2025

Mr. Steil (for himself, Mr. Hill of Arkansas, Mr. Torres …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Digital Asset Issuers
40 mentions across 29 clauses
+16 positive -21 negative ?3 uncertain

Comparable-regime foreign issuers, Endogenously collateralized stablecoin issuers, Federal qualified nonbank stablecoin issuers

Permitted payment stablecoin issuers faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Comparable-regime foreign issuers, Loyalty-token issuers, Nonpayment digital asset issuers

Negative-direction: Endogenously collateralized stablecoin issuers, Federal qualified nonbank stablecoin issuers, Nonbank stablecoin subsidiaries, State qualified stablecoin issuers, Unlicensed stablecoin issuers

Financial Regulators
36 mentions across 27 clauses
-33 negative ?3 uncertain

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal banking regulators

Financial Services
18 mentions across 12 clauses
+15 positive -3 negative

Bank stablecoin subsidiaries, Depository institutions, Federal credit unions

Bank stablecoin subsidiaries faces effects in multiple directions

Consumers
9 mentions across 9 clauses
+9 positive

Payment stablecoin holders

Digital Asset Custody
6 mentions across 6 clauses
-6 negative

Custodial stablecoin intermediaries, Stablecoin custody providers

State Financial Regulators
6 mentions across 6 clauses
-6 negative

State bank supervisors, State payment stablecoin regulators

Congress
6 mentions across 6 clauses
+6 positive

Congressional banking committees

Trust Services
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Trust companies

15/15
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Financial Services Banking Digital Assets Consumer Protection
Actor Mappings
"sec"
→ Securities and Exchange Commission
"ncua"
→ National Credit Union Administration
"board"
→ Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
"treasury"
→ Secretary of the Treasury
"comptroller"
→ Comptroller of the Currency
"corporation"
→ Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

2 terms
"permitted payment stablecoin issuer" §permitted_issuer

A stablecoin issuer that fits the bill's approved bank-subsidiary, Federal nonbank, State qualified, or comparable foreign issuer categories.

"payment stablecoin" §payment_stablecoin

A digital asset used or designed for payment or settlement, denominated in national currency, and redeemable or expected to maintain stable value against a fixed amount of monetary value.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology