HR2357-119

In Committee

Food Secure Strikers Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Mar 26, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Food Secure Strikers Act narrows a SNAP disqualification tied to labor strikes. Current law prevents certain households from participating in SNAP during a strike or caps eligibility based on pre-strike participation. The bill strikes the clause excluding strikers and rewrites section 6(d)(3) so a worker is ineligible only if ineligibility results from being on strike under the remaining statute, rather than using strike status itself as a categorical barrier. In practical terms, striking workers and their households would be judged under ordinary SNAP rules instead of a special striker penalty.

Who Benefits and How

Striking workers benefit because strike status would no longer automatically block SNAP participation. Households of striking workers benefit because food assistance eligibility would turn on ordinary income and household rules rather than the labor dispute. Labor unions benefit because members have less food-security pressure to leave a strike solely to preserve SNAP access. Food banks in strike-affected communities benefit indirectly if eligible households can use SNAP instead of relying entirely on emergency food aid.

Who Bears the Burden and How

State SNAP agencies must update eligibility systems and caseworker guidance for households with members on strike. USDA Food and Nutrition Service staff must issue conforming guidance and monitor state implementation. Employers in labor disputes may face less economic leverage from food-insecurity pressure on striking employees. Federal SNAP spending may rise if more strike-affected households remain eligible for benefits.

Key Provisions

  • Amends the Food and Nutrition Act to remove a clause that made striking workers ineligible for SNAP.
  • Requires strike-related eligibility to be handled without the categorical striker disqualification.
  • Allows households with striking workers to be assessed under ordinary SNAP eligibility rules.
  • Shifts the practical burden from workers in labor disputes to SNAP administrators and federal benefit costs.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Removes the Food and Nutrition Act rule that treats workers as SNAP-ineligible because they are on strike, allowing eligibility to be determined under ordinary SNAP income and household rules instead.

Key Policy Areas

Public Benefits, Labor, Food Assistance

Primary Purpose

Removes the Food and Nutrition Act rule that treats workers as SNAP-ineligible because they are on strike, allowing eligibility to be determined under ordinary SNAP income and household rules instead.

Policy Domains

Public Benefits Labor Food Assistance

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Striking workers
  • Households of striking workers
  • Labor unions
  • Food banks in strike-affected communities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Labor unions:
Striking workers:
Households of striking workers:
Food banks in strike-affected communities:
Identified Costs
  • State SNAP agencies
  • USDA Food and Nutrition Service staff
  • Employers in labor disputes
  • Federal SNAP spending
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State SNAP agencies:
Federal SNAP spending:
Employers in labor disputes:
USDA Food and Nutrition Service staff:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 18, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.

Mar 26, 2025

Ms. Adams (for herself, Mr. Casar, Ms. Norton, Mr. McGarvey, …

Mar 26, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

Mar 26, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Labor
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Striking workers

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Households of striking workers

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

State SNAP agencies

Small Business
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Employers in labor disputes

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Public Benefits Labor Food Assistance

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology