Abolish Super PACs Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Abolish Super PACs Act responds to unlimited contributions to independent expenditure committees after SpeechNow. It makes detailed findings about the growth of super PAC spending, including more than $4.48 billion in independent expenditures in 2024, 2,459 registered super PACs, and the concentration of individual super PAC contributions among the top 1 percent of contributors. The operative amendment changes FECA section 315 so the existing limit on contributions to other political committees also applies to an independent expenditure committee, defined as a political committee that makes at least $5,000 in independent expenditures in a calendar year or contributes at least $5,000 to other independent expenditure committees. The limits apply beginning with the first calendar year after enactment.
Who Benefits and How
Voters concerned about corruption benefit because the bill limits very large contributions to super PAC-style committees. Campaign finance reform organizations benefit from a statutory response to SpeechNow and the post-2010 super PAC funding model. Federal candidates without megadonor networks may benefit if rivals cannot rely on unlimited super PAC contributions from a small donor class. Foreign-interference watchdogs benefit because contribution caps make it harder to route very large foreign-linked funds through third-party contributors.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Independent expenditure committees must comply with FECA contribution limits once they meet the $5,000 expenditure or transfer threshold. Megadonors to super PACs lose the ability to give unlimited amounts to covered independent expenditure committees. FEC enforcement staff must interpret and administer the new independent expenditure committee definition and separate-account treatment. Political committees with independent expenditure accounts must monitor whether those accounts fall within the new definition.
Key Provisions
- Adds independent expenditure committees to FECA's contribution-limit provision for political committees.
- Defines an independent expenditure committee as one making at least $5,000 in independent expenditures or transfers to other such committees in a calendar year.
- Includes separate accounts established for independent expenditures or contributions to independent expenditure committees.
- Applies the amendments beginning with the first calendar year after enactment.
- Uses anti-corruption findings about post-2010 super PAC spending, $4.48 billion in 2024 independent expenditures, and concentrated large-donor funding.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Restores federal contribution limits for independent expenditure committees by defining super PAC-style independent expenditure committees and applying FECA political committee contribution limits to them after the first calendar year following enactment.
Key Policy Areas
Campaign Finance, Elections, Anti-Corruption
Primary Purpose
Restores federal contribution limits for independent expenditure committees by defining super PAC-style independent expenditure committees and applying FECA political committee contribution limits to them after the first calendar year following enactment.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Voters concerned about corruption
- Campaign finance reform organizations
- Federal candidates without megadonor networks
- Foreign-interference watchdogs
Identified Costs
- Independent expenditure committees
- Megadonors to super PACs
- FEC enforcement staff
- Political committees with independent expenditure accounts
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMs. Lee of Pennsylvania (for herself, Mr. Khanna, Mr. McGovern, …
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Campaign finance reform organizations, FEC enforcement staff, Voters concerned about corruption
Positive-direction: Voters concerned about corruption
Negative-direction: FEC enforcement staff
Independent expenditure committees, Megadonors to super PACs
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology