HR2313-119

Reported

Celestial Time Standardization Act

119th Congress Introduced Mar 25, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Celestial Time Standardization Act tells NASA to lead U.S. work on timekeeping beyond Earth. The bill finds that Artemis and Moon to Mars operations will involve government, commercial, academic, and international partners that need interoperable systems, and that ordinary Coordinated Universal Time has problems on the Moon and other celestial bodies because of relativistic effects. NASA must enable celestial time standardization, study and define coordinated lunar time, and develop a strategy for using coordinated lunar time for future operations and infrastructure on and around the Moon.

Who Benefits and How

Commercial space companies benefit because a common lunar time standard can reduce interoperability risk for navigation, communications, payload operations, and lunar infrastructure. Artemis program partners benefit from a shared timing framework for government, commercial, academic, and international systems. Academic space researchers benefit from a standard designed to support precision navigation and science. International standards bodies benefit from a U.S.-led process that gives them a defined consultation role.

Who Bears the Burden and How

NASA must lead the technical study, define coordinated lunar time, prepare the implementation strategy, coordinate across federal agencies, consult outside stakeholders, and brief Congress within two years. The Office of Science and Technology Policy must consult with NASA. The Departments of Commerce, Defense, State, and Transportation face coordination duties because the bill names them as relevant federal entities for the strategy.

Key Provisions

  • Directs NASA to enable celestial time standardization and lead the study and definition of coordinated lunar time.
  • Requires NASA to develop a strategy for implementing coordinated lunar time for operations and infrastructure on and around the Moon.
  • Requires coordination with the Departments of Commerce, Defense, State, and Transportation.
  • Requires consultation with private sector entities, academic entities, international standards bodies, and international partners.
  • Specifies design features for coordinated lunar time, including UTC traceability, precision for navigation and science, resilience without Earth contact, and scalability beyond the Earth-Moon system.
  • Requires a congressional briefing within two years on plans, timelines, and resources needed to implement coordinated lunar time.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Directs NASA, in consultation with the Office of Science and Technology Policy, to lead celestial time standardization by studying coordinated lunar time, developing an implementation strategy for lunar operations and infrastructure, coordinating with named federal agencies, consulting private, academic, international standards, and international partners, and briefing Congress within two years.

Key Policy Areas

Space, Science, Technology, Defense

Primary Purpose

Directs NASA, in consultation with the Office of Science and Technology Policy, to lead celestial time standardization by studying coordinated lunar time, developing an implementation strategy for lunar operations and infrastructure, coordinating with named federal agencies, consulting private, academic, international standards, and international partners, and briefing Congress within two years.

Policy Domains

Space Science Technology Defense

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Commercial space companies
  • Artemis program partners
  • Academic space researchers
  • International standards bodies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Artemis program partners:
Academic space researchers:
Commercial space companies:
International standards bodies:
Identified Costs
  • NASA
  • Office of Science and Technology Policy
  • Department of Commerce
  • Department of Defense
  • Department of State
  • Department of Transportation
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
NASA:
Department of State:
Department of Defense:
Department of Commerce:
Department of Transportation:
Office of Science and Technology Policy:

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 29, 2025

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

Apr 29, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Mar 25, 2025

Ms. McClellan introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Mar 25, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Mar 25, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Space
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

Artemis program partners, NASA

Positive-direction: Artemis program partners

Negative-direction: NASA

Research & Science
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Office of Science and Technology Policy

Defense
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Commercial space companies

Education
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Academic space researchers

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Space Science Technology Defense
Actor Mappings
"nasa"
→ National Aeronautics and Space Administration
"ostp"
→ Office of Science and Technology Policy
"state"
→ Department of State
"defense"
→ Department of Defense
"commerce"
→ Department of Commerce
"transportation"
→ Department of Transportation

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology