HR23-119

Passed House

Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 3, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act responds to International Criminal Court actions involving Israel and to perceived risks to U.S. and allied personnel. The findings state that the United States and Israel are not parties to the Rome Statute, condemn ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan's May 20, 2024 arrest-warrant applications for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, condemn the November 21, 2024 ICC Pre-Trial Chamber warrants, and cite the American Servicemembers' Protection Act. If the ICC attempts to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute a protected person, the President must impose sanctions within 60 days and on an ongoing basis against foreign persons who directly engage in, aid, materially support, finance, sponsor, provide goods or services for, or act for persons involved in those ICC efforts. Sanctions include IEEPA property blocking, visa inadmissibility, visa revocation, and entry-document cancellation. Immediate family members of sanctioned foreign persons are also barred from U.S. admission. The bill rescinds any available U.S. appropriations for the ICC, prohibits future appropriated funds for the ICC, and defines protected persons to include U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, current or former U.S. Armed Forces members, U.S. officials and employees, and comparable citizens or lawful residents of NATO or major non-NATO allies that have not consented to ICC jurisdiction.

Who Benefits and How

U.S. Armed Forces members, former U.S. servicemembers, U.S. elected officials, U.S. appointed officials, U.S. government employees, Israeli officials, Israeli military personnel, NATO ally officials, major non-NATO ally officials, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and U.S. allies not party to the Rome Statute benefit from a sanctions shield that raises the cost of ICC action against protected persons.

Who Bears the Burden and How

ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan, ICC officials working on protected-person cases, ICC staff aiding covered investigations, foreign persons materially supporting covered ICC efforts, organizations financing covered ICC efforts, immediate family members of sanctioned foreign persons, the International Criminal Court, banks holding blocked property, visa applicants tied to sanctioned persons, and State Department consular staff must comply with property blocking, transaction bans, inadmissibility, visa revocation, family-member entry bars, funding rescission, and sanctions-administration work. Sanctioned people lose access to U.S. visas and U.S.-linked property, banks must block transactions, consular offices must cancel entry documents, and the ICC loses any available or future U.S. appropriated funding.

Key Provisions

  • Requires the President to impose sanctions within 60 days when the ICC attempts to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute a protected person.
  • Blocks property and transactions of foreign persons involved in or supporting covered ICC efforts.
  • Bars sanctioned foreign persons and their immediate family members from U.S. admission and visa benefits.
  • Rescinds available U.S. appropriations for the International Criminal Court.
  • Prohibits future appropriated U.S. funds from being used for the International Criminal Court.
  • Defines protected persons to include U.S. persons and citizens or lawful residents of NATO and major non-NATO allies that have not consented to ICC jurisdiction.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires sanctions against foreign persons who support International Criminal Court investigations, arrests, detentions, or prosecutions of protected U.S. or allied persons, bars sanctioned persons and immediate family members from U.S. admission, rescinds and prohibits U.S. funding for the ICC, and defines protected persons to include U.S. and allied military, officials, employees, and citizens.

Key Policy Areas

Foreign Affairs, Sanctions, International Law

Primary Purpose

Requires sanctions against foreign persons who support International Criminal Court investigations, arrests, detentions, or prosecutions of protected U.S. or allied persons, bars sanctioned persons and immediate family members from U.S. admission, rescinds and prohibits U.S. funding for the ICC, and defines protected persons to include U.S. and allied military, officials, employees, and citizens.

Policy Domains

Foreign Affairs Sanctions International Law

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • U.S. Armed Forces members
  • Former U.S. servicemembers
  • U.S. elected officials
  • U.S. appointed officials
  • U.S. government employees
  • Israeli officials
  • Israeli military personnel
  • NATO ally officials
  • Major non-NATO ally officials
  • Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Israeli officials: , , ,
NATO ally officials: , , ,
U.S. elected officials: , , ,
U.S. appointed officials: , , ,
U.S. Armed Forces members: , , ,
U.S. government employees: , , ,
Former U.S. servicemembers: , , ,
Israeli military personnel: , , ,
Major non-NATO ally officials: , , ,
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan
  • ICC officials working on protected-person cases
  • ICC staff aiding covered investigations
  • Foreign persons materially supporting covered ICC efforts
  • Organizations financing covered ICC efforts
  • Immediate family members of sanctioned foreign persons
  • International Criminal Court
  • Banks holding blocked property
  • State Department consular staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan: , , ,
International Criminal Court: , , ,
Banks holding blocked property: , , ,
State Department consular staff: , , ,
ICC staff aiding covered investigations: , , ,
Organizations financing covered ICC efforts: , , ,
ICC officials working on protected-person cases: , , ,
Immediate family members of sanctioned foreign persons: , , ,
Foreign persons materially supporting covered ICC efforts: , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 28, 2025

Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not …

Jan 23, 2025

Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure …

Jan 23, 2025

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. …

Jan 13, 2025

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

Jan 13, 2025

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under …

Jan 13, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Jan 9, 2025

Received; read the first time

Jan 9, 2025

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Jan 9, 2025

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate …

Jan 9, 2025

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 5. (consideration: …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Foreign Affairs
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -4 negative

Foreign persons materially supporting covered ICC efforts, ICC officials working on Israel cases, ICC officials working on protected-person cases

Positive-direction: Israeli officials, NATO ally officials

Negative-direction: Foreign persons materially supporting covered ICC efforts, ICC officials working on Israel cases, ICC officials working on protected-person cases, International Criminal Court

General Public
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative

Immediate family members of sanctioned foreign persons, Taxpayers

Positive-direction: Taxpayers

Negative-direction: Immediate family members of sanctioned foreign persons

Law Enforcement
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

U.S. Armed Forces members

Nonprofits
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Organizations financing covered ICC efforts

Financial Services
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Banks holding blocked property

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Federal agencies managing ICC-related funds

4/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown
Senate Roll #22

On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed H.R. 23

Motion to Invoke Cloture: Motion to Proceed to H.R. 23

Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
54 Yea 45 Nay 1 Not Voting
Jan 28, 2025

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Foreign Affairs Sanctions International Law
Actor Mappings
"icc"
→ International Criminal Court
"protected_person"
→ U.S. or allied person protected by the bill from covered ICC action

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology