HR22-119

Passed House

SAVE Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 3, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

H.R. 22, the SAVE Act, would amend the National Voter Registration Act to require documentary proof of United States citizenship when applying to register for federal elections through covered registration methods. Noncitizen voting in federal contests is already restricted by federal law; this proposal changes proof, administration, list maintenance and enforcement rather than first creating a citizenship qualification. The official record checked September 22, 2026 lists receipt in the Senate on April 10, 2025 as its latest action. H.R. 22 is not enacted, and its introduced and House-passed texts are substantively identical.

Accepted evidence includes a valid United States passport; a REAL ID-compliant document that actually indicates citizenship; military identification combined with a service record showing United States birth; specified government photo identification showing United States birth; or government photo identification paired with one of the listed birth, adoption, consular, naturalization/citizenship or KIC American Indian records. The text does not make an ordinary driver's license, every REAL ID card, or a birth certificate by itself universally sufficient.

Covered mail-form applicants generally must present proof in person to the election office by the registration deadline or, where the specified same-day/early-voting registration option exists, at the polling place by election day. States must provide instructions and reasonable disability accommodations. A separate process requires an applicant lacking the listed proof to attest under penalty of perjury and provide other evidence, followed by an official citizenship determination and sworn affidavit. States must also provide a process for document discrepancies. Neither alternative evidence nor a discrepancy automatically disqualifies or automatically registers the applicant.

Who Benefits and How

State election officials gain access, without federal response fees, to relevant federal citizenship-verification information, including requested batches, within 24 hours. That can improve the information available for registration decisions, although this text does not establish the error rate of any database or quantify prevented unlawful voting. The bill does not guarantee electoral outcomes or provide financial benefits to a political party.

Applicants unable to produce the listed documents receive an express alternative-evidence process relative to a strict document-only rule. Applicants with document discrepancies and mail applicants with disabilities receive stated procedural safeguards. Newly naturalized citizens benefit from prompt DHS notices to their State's chief election official, potentially reducing outdated-status problems, but notification is not automatic voter registration. Provisional-ballot rights are preserved, with counting under the safeguard tied to citizenship verification under the new process.

Persons aggrieved by the specified registration violations gain an express basis within the existing NVRA civil-enforcement framework. The bill does not create unrestricted standing, automatic damages or a guaranteed lawsuit outcome. The Election Assistance Commission and other officials developing the covered registration materials receive an exemption from the Paperwork Reduction Act's information-collection review requirements.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Eligible citizens applying for covered registration would face document-production requirements and, for covered mail forms, an in-person presentation step. Obtaining records, resolving discrepancies or traveling to an election office can impose time and expense, especially when acceptable documents are not readily available. The text does not quantify those costs or establish that a particular demographic group is categorically barred. It also does not require every existing voter to reapply solely because of enactment, although its verification and list-maintenance duties concern current rolls.

State election officials, motor-vehicle authorities and designated registration agencies must check citizenship evidence, revise forms, notify applicants, record document details and operate verification processes. An ongoing State verification program must be established within 30 days. Federal agencies holding relevant data face the 24-hour response and interagency-sharing requirements. DHS must investigate whether to initiate removal proceedings when the specified checks determine that a noncitizen is unlawfully registered; this is not automatic deportation.

The proposal directs removal from federal rolls on documentary or verified noncitizenship information and adds such removals to the stated exception to the NVRA 90-day systematic-removal cutoff. It also adds State-law noncompliance as a removal ground. It does not authorize removal solely on an unverified suspicion or establish that a database mismatch alone proves noncitizenship.

Election officials face additional civil and criminal exposure for registration without the required proof, and executive-branch personnel face the added material-assistance provision. The criminal amendments remain within the existing knowing-and-willful deprivation/fraud framework and its fine/up-to-five-year penalty; they are not strict liability for every clerical error. The bill provides no separate implementation appropriation. Its immediate effective date precedes the ten-day guidance and thirty-day verification-program deadlines.

Key Provisions

  • Requires the specified citizenship evidence for covered registration, with sworn alternative-evidence and discrepancy-resolution procedures.
  • Requires in-person proof for covered mail applications, applicant notices and reasonable disability accommodations; does not itself abolish absentee voting.
  • Directs State verification programs within 30 days, relevant federal data responses within 24 hours without response fees, and specified noncitizen list removals.
  • Expands civil enforcement and inserts specified conduct into existing NVRA criminal provisions, retaining their governing intent elements.
  • Requires Election Assistance Commission implementation guidance within ten days and prompt DHS naturalization notices to State election officials.
  • Exempts development/modification of covered registration materials from Paperwork Reduction Act review and preserves provisional-ballot safeguards.
  • Extends specified NVRA record/verification requirements to the historically exempt same-day-registration category, with the stated identical-State-law alternative; it does not eliminate every exemption.
  • Applies on enactment to applications submitted on or after enactment and preserves exemptions from federal laws other than the NVRA.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Require documentary citizenship verification for covered federal voter-registration applications, expand verification and list-maintenance duties, and add enforcement provisions while preserving specified alternative-proof and ballot safeguards.

Key Policy Areas

Civil Rights, Government Operations, Immigration

Primary Purpose

Require documentary citizenship verification for covered federal voter-registration applications, expand verification and list-maintenance duties, and add enforcement provisions while preserving specified alternative-proof and ballot safeguards.

Policy Domains

Civil Rights Government Operations Immigration

bill_wide

Identified Gains
  • State election officials receiving citizenship-verification information
  • United States citizen applicants using alternative-evidence procedures
  • Applicants with disabilities receiving reasonable accommodations
  • Newly naturalized citizens receiving registration-status safeguards
  • Election Assistance Commission registration-material developers
Model: codex-gpt-6-inline | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: eh
Election Assistance Commission registration-material developers: , , , , , ,
Applicants with disabilities receiving reasonable accommodations: , , , , , ,
Newly naturalized citizens receiving registration-status safeguards: , , , , , ,
United States citizen applicants using alternative-evidence procedures: , , , , , ,
State election officials receiving citizenship-verification information: , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Eligible citizen applicants obtaining citizenship documents
  • State election officials administering registration and list verification
  • State motor-vehicle agencies verifying applicants
  • Department of Homeland Security verification and investigation staff
  • Social Security Administration verification staff
  • Election Assistance Commission implementation staff
Model: codex-gpt-6-inline | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: eh
Social Security Administration verification staff: , , , , , ,
State motor-vehicle agencies verifying applicants: , , , , , ,
Election Assistance Commission implementation staff: , , , , , ,
Eligible citizen applicants obtaining citizenship documents: , , , , , ,
Department of Homeland Security verification and investigation staff: , , , , , ,
State election officials administering registration and list verification: , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 10, 2025

Received in the Senate.

Apr 10, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Apr 10, 2025

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - …

Apr 10, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …

Apr 10, 2025

On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: …

Apr 10, 2025

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1580-1581)

Apr 10, 2025

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. …

Apr 10, 2025

The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered …

Apr 10, 2025

Ms. Johnson (TX) moved to recommit to the Committee on …

Apr 10, 2025

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
13 mentions across 6 clauses
+5 positive -8 negative

Department of Homeland Security citizenship-data response and investigations, Department of Homeland Security naturalization notifications, Election Assistance Commission alternative-evidence forms administration

Positive-direction: Election Assistance Commission covered registration-material development, State chief election officials receiving implementation guidance, State chief election officials receiving naturalization information, State election authorities obtaining fee-free federal verification data, States retaining exemptions under federal laws other than NVRA

Negative-direction: Department of Homeland Security citizenship-data response and investigations, Department of Homeland Security naturalization notifications, Election Assistance Commission alternative-evidence forms administration, Election Assistance Commission implementation guidance, Social Security Administration responsive verification information, State election authorities administering the immediate registration transition, State election authorities implementing citizenship verification, State motor-vehicle departments implementing citizenship checks

General Public
12 mentions across 4 clauses
+6 positive -6 negative

Aggrieved persons using the expanded NVRA civil-enforcement ground, Applicants resolving discrepancies in citizenship documents, Applicants with disabilities using required registration accommodations

Positive-direction: Aggrieved persons using the expanded NVRA civil-enforcement ground, Applicants resolving discrepancies in citizenship documents, Applicants with disabilities using required registration accommodations, Citizen applicants using the prescribed alternative-evidence process, Newly naturalized citizens whose status is communicated to election officials, Provisional voters whose citizenship is verified under the prescribed process

Negative-direction: Election officials subject to the specified registration enforcement provisions, Eligible citizen applicants obtaining required registration documents, Executive-branch personnel subject to the specified unlawful-assistance provision, Mail-form applicants subject to in-person citizenship-proof presentation, Noncitizens determined unlawfully registered for federal elections, Post-enactment registration applicants subject to the new proof requirements

7/8
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown
House Roll #102

On Passage

SAVE Act

Passed
220 Yea 208 Nay 5 Not Voting
Apr 10, 2025
House Roll #101

On Motion to Recommit

SAVE Act

Failed
211 Yea 215 Nay 7 Not Voting
Apr 10, 2025

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Civil Rights Government Operations Immigration
Actor Mappings
"officials"
→ Covered State/local election and voter-registration officials
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Homeland Security
"commission"
→ Election Assistance Commission
Domains
Civil Rights Government Operations
Actor Mappings
"states"
→ States according to the specified NVRA applicability rules
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Homeland Security
"commission"
→ Election Assistance Commission

Note: This is H.R.22 as House-passed April10,2025, not a similarly named later bill or an executive order. It is unenacted; no instruction here describes these proposed requirements as current voter-registration advice.

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"documentary proof of citizenship" §2(a)

Only the enumerated documents or document combinations, with State alternative-evidence/discrepancy procedures separately prescribed in proposed NVRA8(j)(2).

"alternative evidence" §2(f)

Applicant citizenship/eligibility attestation under penalty of perjury plus other evidence, an official sufficiency determination and an official affidavit on the EAC form; not an unconditional waiver.

"certain exempt States" §2(k)

The historically qualifying polling-place-registration category in redesignated NVRA4(c)(2); extends subsections8(i)/(j), with an identical State-rule alternative adopted at least60days before the first post-enactment federal election.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology