HR2120-119

In Committee

ROCR Value Based Program Act

119th Congress Introduced Mar 14, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The ROCR Value Based Program Act creates a Medicare episode-based payment model for radiation oncology. Congress finds that nearly 60 percent of cancer patients receive radiation therapy and that Medicare spent about $4.2 billion on radiation oncology services in 2021, while current payment systems can create unstable rates and volume incentives. Within one year, CMS must establish a Radiation Oncology Case Rate Value Based Payment Program providing per-episode payments to radiation therapy providers and suppliers for covered treatment to Part B beneficiaries who are not in Medicare Advantage or PACE and have included cancer types such as breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, head and neck, cervical, uterine, pancreatic, lymphoma, anal, bladder, brain metastases, and bone metastases. Episodes begin with radiation therapy planning and last 90 days for most cancers and 30 days for bone and brain metastases if treatment starts within 30 days. The program excludes specified modalities such as brachytherapy, proton therapy, intraoperative radiotherapy, superficial radiation therapy, hyperthermia, and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals for 12 years, with later inclusion by regulation after considering market penetration, cost, clinical benefit, and stakeholder consensus. CMS may not reduce physician-fee-schedule or outpatient payment rates before program regulations take effect. Accreditation organizations must maintain modern quality standards for linear accelerator technology, staffing, safety, and public comment, updated every five to seven years. GAO must report after seven years on implementation, spending, access, cancer-type and modality scope, and Medicare Advantage application, and within three years on radiation therapy deserts and grants or loans for modern technology. The bill also creates a civil monetary penalty safe harbor for free or discounted non-luxury transportation for established radiation therapy patients within 75 miles or in rural areas under uniform, non-marketed policies, and prevents reduced ROCR expenditures from triggering budget-neutrality cuts under OPPS or the physician fee schedule.

Who Benefits and How

Medicare radiation therapy patients benefit from a payment model intended to stabilize access and reduce disparities in radiation oncology care. Radiation oncology providers benefit from unified case-rate payments and a freeze on rate reductions until program regulations take effect. Rural cancer patients benefit from GAO review of radiation therapy deserts and compliant free or discounted transportation services. Radiation therapy technology suppliers benefit if accreditation standards and GAO recommendations support modern equipment access.

Who Bears the Burden and How

CMS must design episode payments, covered cancer types, quality rules, exclusions, accreditation requirements, and budget-neutrality treatment. Radiation therapy providers and suppliers must comply with accreditation, quality, data, and case-rate payment rules. Accreditation organizations must update radiation therapy quality standards every five to seven years with stakeholder input. GAO must produce access, technology, and implementation reports. Federal taxpayers and Medicare financing sources bear program design, payment, transportation-safe-harbor, and non-budget-neutral savings effects.

Key Provisions

  • Creates a Medicare Radiation Oncology Case Rate Value Based Payment Program within one year.
  • Provides episode-based payments for included cancer types and Part B beneficiaries outside Medicare Advantage and PACE.
  • Excludes selected modalities for 12 years unless later included by regulation after statutory review.
  • Requires modern accreditation standards for linear accelerator technology, staffing, patient safety, and quality.
  • Provides a compliant transportation services safe harbor for established radiation therapy patients.
  • Bars ROCR savings from triggering OPPS or physician fee schedule budget-neutrality adjustments.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a Medicare Radiation Oncology Case Rate Value Based Payment Program with episode-based payments for selected cancer radiation therapy, freezes rate reductions until regulations, adds quality and accreditation requirements, permits compliant patient transportation services, exempts program savings from budget-neutrality adjustments, and requires GAO access and technology reports.

Key Policy Areas

Medicare, Cancer Care, Radiation Oncology

Primary Purpose

Creates a Medicare Radiation Oncology Case Rate Value Based Payment Program with episode-based payments for selected cancer radiation therapy, freezes rate reductions until regulations, adds quality and accreditation requirements, permits compliant patient transportation services, exempts program savings from budget-neutrality adjustments, and requires GAO access and technology reports.

Policy Domains

Medicare Cancer Care Radiation Oncology

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Medicare radiation therapy patients
  • Radiation oncology providers
  • Rural cancer patients
  • Radiation therapy technology suppliers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Rural cancer patients: , , , ,
Radiation oncology providers: , , , ,
Medicare radiation therapy patients: , , , ,
Radiation therapy technology suppliers: , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
  • Radiation therapy suppliers
  • Accreditation organizations
  • GAO
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
GAO: , , , ,
Federal taxpayers: , , , ,
Accreditation organizations: , , , ,
Radiation therapy suppliers: , , , ,
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 14, 2025

Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania, …

Mar 14, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in …

Mar 14, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Health Care
25 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive -10 negative ?10 uncertain

Accreditation organizations, Medicare radiation therapy patients, Radiation oncology providers

Positive-direction: Radiation oncology providers

Negative-direction: Accreditation organizations, Radiation therapy suppliers

Healthcare
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

Radiation therapy technology suppliers

Government
5 mentions across 5 clauses
-5 negative

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

Taxpayers
5 mentions across 5 clauses
-5 negative

Taxpayers

6/6
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Medicare Cancer Care Radiation Oncology

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology