To require the District of Columbia to comply with federal immigration laws.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The District of Columbia Federal Immigration Compliance Act of 2025 prohibits D.C. from having any statute, ordinance, policy, or practice that restricts District government entities or officials from sending, receiving, maintaining, or exchanging information about a person's lawful or unlawful citizenship or immigration status with any federal, state, or local government entity. It also bars D.C. policies that restrict compliance with lawful Department of Homeland Security requests under Immigration and Nationality Act sections 236 or 287 to honor an immigration detainer or notify DHS about an individual's release. The bill preserves a narrower exception: D.C. is not treated as violating the bill solely because it has a policy under which officials do not share information about, or comply with a DHS detainer for, a person who comes forward as a victim or witness to a criminal offense.
Who Benefits and How
The Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, federal immigration prosecutors, state and local agencies seeking immigration-status information, House oversight committees, and supporters of federal-local immigration cooperation benefit because D.C. government entities must share citizenship or immigration-status information and comply with lawful detainer or release-notification requests. Immigrant victims and witnesses also benefit from the retained exception that allows D.C. to protect people who come forward to report or witness crimes.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The District of Columbia government, D.C. police officials, D.C. corrections staff, D.C. agency database administrators, D.C. legal counsel, undocumented immigrants in D.C., immigrant families using District services, immigrant-service nonprofits, and local officials who prefer sanctuary policies must change information-sharing practices, comply with lawful DHS detainers or release notices, manage privacy and trust concerns, and face increased risk of immigration enforcement when individuals interact with District agencies outside the victim-or-witness exception.
Key Provisions
- Prohibits D.C. policies restricting immigration-status information sharing with federal, state, or local government entities.
- Requires D.C. officials to comply with lawful DHS detainer and release-notification requests under INA sections 236 and 287.
- Preserves an exception for D.C. policies concerning individuals who come forward as crime victims or witnesses.
- Limits D.C.'s ability to maintain sanctuary-jurisdiction practices that block federal immigration cooperation.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Bars the District of Columbia from maintaining sanctuary-jurisdiction laws, ordinances, policies, or practices that restrict immigration-status information sharing or lawful DHS detainer and release-notification requests, while preserving an exception for D.C. policies covering individuals who come forward as crime victims or witnesses.
Key Policy Areas
Immigration, District of Columbia, Law Enforcement
Primary Purpose
Bars the District of Columbia from maintaining sanctuary-jurisdiction laws, ordinances, policies, or practices that restrict immigration-status information sharing or lawful DHS detainer and release-notification requests, while preserving an exception for D.C. policies covering individuals who come forward as crime victims or witnesses.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers
- Federal immigration prosecutors
- State and local agencies
- House oversight committees
- Supporters of federal-local immigration cooperation
- Immigrant victims and witnesses
Identified Costs
- District of Columbia government
- D.C. police officials
- D.C. corrections staff
- D.C. agency database administrators
- D.C. legal counsel
- Undocumented immigrants in D.C.
- Immigrant families
- Immigrant-service nonprofits
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseReceived; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland …
Passed House (inferred from eh version)
Additional sponsor: Mr. Moore of Alabama
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …
Mr. Higgins of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
D.C. corrections staff, D.C. police officials, District of Columbia government
Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers
Immigrant victims and witnesses, Undocumented immigrants in D.C.
Positive-direction: Immigrant victims and witnesses
Negative-direction: Undocumented immigrants in D.C.
On Passage
District of Columbia Federal Immigration Compliance Act
On Motion to Recommit
District of Columbia Federal Immigration Compliance Act
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "dhs"
- → Department of Homeland Security
- "district"
- → District of Columbia
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology