NEWBORN Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The NEWBORN Act adds infant mortality pilot grants to the Public Health Service Act. HHS, through the HRSA Administrator, must award grants to eligible county, city, territorial, Tribal, or centralized state health departments to create, implement, and oversee pilot programs for up to five years. HHS must prefer proposals serving the 50 counties or groups of counties with the highest infant mortality rates based on the most recent three years of national data and proposals addressing birth defects, preterm birth and low birth weight, sudden infant death, maternal pregnancy complications, or infant injuries. Grant activities can include community needs plans, outreach to at-risk mothers, systems improving access and quality for social, educational, and clinical services, infant care and parenting counseling, postpartum care, premature-delivery prevention, smoking cessation, drug and alcohol treatment, nutrition, physical activity, postpartum depression, domestic violence, social and psychological services, dental care, rural outreach, public education campaigns, coordination with local health departments and existing infant mortality entities, and other strategies in the plan. Grantees may use no more than 10 percent for evaluation and must report annually; HHS uses reports for evaluation and statistical research. The bill authorizes $10 million for each fiscal year 2025 through 2029.
Who Benefits and How
Infants in high-mortality counties benefit from targeted pilot programs focused on preventable causes of infant death. At-risk mothers benefit from outreach, counseling, postpartum care, substance-use treatment, domestic-violence services, and rural care connections. County and Tribal health departments benefit from up to five-year grants to build infant mortality programs. Maternal and child health organizations benefit from coordination with local public health departments and existing service providers.
Who Bears the Burden and How
HRSA must award grants, set preferences, evaluate reports, and conduct statistical research on pilot outcomes. Grantee health departments must design community plans, coordinate providers, limit evaluation spending, and report annually. Federal taxpayers fund the $10 million annual authorization for fiscal years 2025 through 2029. Rural health providers may need to expand outreach and service coordination for at-risk mothers.
Key Provisions
- Creates HRSA infant mortality pilot program grants for eligible local, territorial, Tribal, and state health departments.
- Prioritizes the 50 counties or county groups with the highest infant mortality rates.
- Funds programs addressing birth defects, preterm birth, low birth weight, sudden infant death, maternal complications, and infant injuries.
- Authorizes outreach, clinical and social service coordination, rural programs, public education, and annual reporting.
- Authorizes $10 million for each fiscal year 2025 through 2029.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Authorizes HRSA grants of up to five years for infant mortality pilot programs, prioritizing the 50 counties or county groups with the highest infant mortality rates and programs addressing birth defects, preterm birth, low birth weight, sudden infant death, maternal pregnancy complications, and infant injuries.
Key Policy Areas
Public Health, Maternal Health, Infant Mortality, Federal Grants
Primary Purpose
Authorizes HRSA grants of up to five years for infant mortality pilot programs, prioritizing the 50 counties or county groups with the highest infant mortality rates and programs addressing birth defects, preterm birth, low birth weight, sudden infant death, maternal pregnancy complications, and infant injuries.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Infants in high-mortality counties
- At-risk mothers
- County health departments
- Tribal health departments
- Maternal and child health organizations
Identified Costs
- Health Resources and Services Administration
- Grantee health departments
- Federal taxpayers
- Rural health providers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Cohen (for himself, Ms. Barragán, Ms. Budzinski, Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick, …
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
At-risk mothers, Infants in high-mortality counties
Health Resources and Services Administration, Tribal health departments
Positive-direction: Tribal health departments
Negative-direction: Health Resources and Services Administration
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology