ACRES Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The ACRES Act standardizes how federal land agencies count hazardous-fuels-reduction work. Beginning with the first fiscal year after enactment, the Agriculture Secretary for National Forest System lands and the Interior Secretary for public lands and National Park System units must include a hazardous-fuels-reduction acreage report in materials supporting the President's budget. The report must record acres where treatment was completed and count each acre only once during the reporting period, even if multiple treatments occurred. For the recorded acres, agencies must report whether they are in the wildland-urban interface, the wildfire-risk level on the first and last day of the period, treatment types, whether work occurred in a resource-benefit wildfire or planned project, cost per acre, region or system unit, and effectiveness in reducing wildfire risk. The reports must be posted on Agriculture and Interior websites. Within 90 days, the secretaries must implement standardized tracking procedures with data reviews, verification methods, effectiveness analysis, and methods to separate partial wildland-urban-interface acreage. Within two weeks after implementation, they must report the procedures and recommendations to Congress. Within two years, GAO must study implementation limits. The bill authorizes no additional funds.
Who Benefits and How
Congressional appropriations committees, congressional natural-resources committees, taxpayers, wildfire-prone communities, wildland-urban-interface residents, state foresters, county emergency managers, wildfire researchers, budget analysts, and government watchdog organizations benefit from clearer acreage, cost, risk, location, and effectiveness data. The bill helps readers distinguish completed treatment acres from double-counted activity totals and compare planned projects with wildfires managed for resource benefits.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, hazardous-fuels program managers, GIS data staff, budget-reporting offices, GAO auditors, regional land managers, and fire-program analysts must implement standardized tracking, validate data accuracy, distinguish wildland-urban-interface acreage, calculate cost per acre, assess short- and long-term effectiveness, publish annual reports, and complete the GAO study without additional authorized funds.
Key Provisions
- Requires annual budget-support reports on hazardous-fuels-reduction acres for the preceding fiscal year.
- Requires each treated acre to be counted once even if multiple hazardous-fuels activities occur on that acre.
- Requires reporting on wildland-urban-interface location, wildfire-risk level, treatment type, cost per acre, region or unit, and effectiveness.
- Requires standardized data-tracking procedures within 90 days and public posting on Agriculture and Interior websites.
- Requires a congressional report on tracking procedures and policy recommendations within two weeks after implementation.
- Requires GAO to study implementation within two years and provides no new authorization of funds.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires Agriculture and Interior to report hazardous-fuels-reduction acres in annual budget materials, count each treated acre only once, disclose wildfire-risk, treatment, location, cost, and effectiveness data, implement standardized tracking procedures within 90 days, report limitations to Congress, and obtain a GAO implementation study.
Key Policy Areas
Wildfire, Forestry, Government Transparency
Primary Purpose
Requires Agriculture and Interior to report hazardous-fuels-reduction acres in annual budget materials, count each treated acre only once, disclose wildfire-risk, treatment, location, cost, and effectiveness data, implement standardized tracking procedures within 90 days, report limitations to Congress, and obtain a GAO implementation study.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Congressional appropriations committees
- Congressional natural-resources committees
- Taxpayers
- Wildfire-prone communities
- Wildland-urban-interface residents
- State foresters
- County emergency managers
- Wildfire researchers
- Government watchdog organizations
Identified Costs
- Department of Agriculture
- U.S. Forest Service
- Department of the Interior
- Bureau of Land Management
- National Park Service
- Hazardous-fuels program managers
- GIS data staff
- Budget-reporting offices
- GAO auditors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseCommittee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported …
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, …
Passed House (inferred from eh version)
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy …
Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the …
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill …
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Bureau of Land Management, Congressional appropriations committees, Department of Agriculture
Positive-direction: Congressional appropriations committees
Negative-direction: Bureau of Land Management, Department of Agriculture, Department of the Interior, Forest Service, GAO auditors, National Park Service
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "comptroller_general"
- → Comptroller General of the United States
- "secretary_concerned"
- → Secretary of Agriculture for National Forest System lands and Secretary of the Interior for public lands and National Park System units
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology