HR2011-119

In Committee

Sarah Debbink Langenkamp Active Transportation Safety Act

119th Congress Introduced Mar 10, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Sarah Debbink Langenkamp Active Transportation Safety Act makes bicyclist, pedestrian, and vulnerable-road-user projects easier to fund under federal highway safety programs. It adds connecting two or more existing bicyclist or pedestrian infrastructure segments and reducing vulnerable-road-user safety risks through approved project strategies to the Highway Safety Improvement Program. It allows a federal share of up to 100 percent for those HSIP projects. It also adds flexible financing for Transportation Alternatives projects, lets HSIP funds count toward the non-federal share when projects include Federal Highway Administration proven safety countermeasures, are tied to a vulnerable-road-user emphasis area in a State strategic highway safety plan, or are identified through local, metropolitan, regional, Tribal, Complete Streets, Vision Zero, ADA transition, comprehensive safety action, or similar safety plans. The bill adds bicyclist and pedestrian proven safety countermeasures to the title 23 list of safety projects eligible for increased federal share treatment.

Who Benefits and How

Bicyclists benefit because missing links between existing bike infrastructure become eligible highway safety projects. Pedestrians benefit because vulnerable-road-user risk-reduction projects can receive up to 100 percent federal funding. Local governments benefit because safety plans such as Vision Zero, Complete Streets, and local roadway safety plans can support project eligibility. State transportation departments benefit from flexible federal-share and matching rules for active-transportation safety projects.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Federal Highway Administration must determine proven safety countermeasures and administer expanded eligibility. State DOT safety offices must update HSIP project selection and federal-share calculations. Metropolitan planning organizations must document safety-plan links when using the flexible match rules. Federal taxpayers fund a larger share of qualifying active-transportation safety projects.

Key Provisions

  • Adds connected bicyclist and pedestrian infrastructure segments to Highway Safety Improvement Program eligibility.
  • Adds vulnerable-road-user risk-reduction strategies to highway safety project eligibility.
  • Authorizes up to 100 percent federal share for qualifying HSIP projects.
  • Allows HSIP funds to count toward the non-federal share for qualifying active-transportation projects.
  • Recognizes pedestrian, bicycle, Complete Streets, Vision Zero, ADA transition, Tribal, and comprehensive safety action plans.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Expands highway safety eligibility and federal-share rules for bicyclist, pedestrian, and vulnerable-road-user projects, including connected active-transportation segments, proven safety countermeasures, and safety-plan-based projects.

Key Policy Areas

Transportation, Highway Safety, Active Transportation

Primary Purpose

Expands highway safety eligibility and federal-share rules for bicyclist, pedestrian, and vulnerable-road-user projects, including connected active-transportation segments, proven safety countermeasures, and safety-plan-based projects.

Policy Domains

Transportation Highway Safety Active Transportation

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Bicyclists
  • Pedestrians
  • Local governments
  • State transportation departments
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Bicyclists:
Pedestrians:
Local governments:
State transportation departments:
Identified Costs
  • Federal Highway Administration
  • State DOT safety offices
  • Metropolitan planning organizations
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers:
State DOT safety offices:
Federal Highway Administration:
Metropolitan planning organizations:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 10, 2025

Mr. Raskin (for himself, Mr. Steil, Mr. Thompson of California, …

Mar 10, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

Mar 10, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Mar 10, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Transportation
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Bicyclists, Pedestrians

Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
-1 negative ?1 uncertain

Federal Highway Administration, State transportation departments

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Local governments

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Taxpayers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Transportation Highway Safety Active Transportation

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology