HR1995-119

In Committee

Securing American Agriculture Act

119th Congress Introduced Mar 10, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Securing American Agriculture Act turns agricultural input dependency into an annual USDA reporting duty. The Agriculture Secretary must assess whether U.S. dependence on critical agricultural products or inputs could be exploited if the People's Republic of China weaponized a supply-chain dependency. The assessment must cover domestic production capacity, current and potential bottlenecks, recommendations to mitigate PRC supply-chain threats, and legislative or regulatory steps to onshore or nearshore production. Covered inputs include agricultural equipment, machinery, and technology; fuel; fertilizers; feed and its components such as vitamins, amino acids, and minerals; veterinary drugs and vaccines; crop-protection chemicals; seed; and any other USDA-designated critical agricultural input. USDA may not require private entities to provide information, must use submitted information only for aggregate reporting, and must protect trade secrets and confidential commercial information.

Who Benefits and How

Farmers and ranchers benefit from a recurring federal assessment of input vulnerabilities that could affect planting, livestock health, fuel, fertilizer, and equipment availability. Agricultural input manufacturers benefit if USDA recommendations support onshoring or nearshoring equipment, fertilizer, feed components, veterinary drugs, vaccines, chemicals, or seed. Congressional agriculture committees benefit from annual information about bottlenecks and PRC-linked supply-chain risks. Private agricultural suppliers benefit from confidentiality rules and the ban on mandatory information submissions.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Department of Agriculture must conduct annual assessments, protect submitted business information, and write mitigation recommendations. USDA analysts must evaluate multiple input markets and distinguish aggregate reporting from protected trade secrets. PRC-linked agricultural input suppliers may lose business if Congress or USDA uses the reports to reduce dependence. Federal taxpayers fund the recurring USDA supply-chain review.

Key Provisions

  • Requires annual USDA reports on critical agricultural input dependencies exploitable by the People's Republic of China.
  • Directs domestic capacity, bottleneck, mitigation, onshoring, and nearshoring analysis.
  • Covers equipment, fuel, fertilizers, feed components, veterinary drugs, vaccines, crop chemicals, seed, and other critical inputs.
  • Protects trade secrets and bars USDA from forcing private entities to provide information.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires USDA to submit an annual assessment of U.S. dependency on critical agricultural products and inputs that could be exploited by the People's Republic of China, including domestic capacity, bottlenecks, mitigation recommendations, and confidentiality protections.

Key Policy Areas

Agriculture, Supply Chains, National Security

Primary Purpose

Requires USDA to submit an annual assessment of U.S. dependency on critical agricultural products and inputs that could be exploited by the People's Republic of China, including domestic capacity, bottlenecks, mitigation recommendations, and confidentiality protections.

Policy Domains

Agriculture Supply Chains National Security

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Farmers and ranchers
  • Agricultural input manufacturers
  • Congressional agriculture committees
  • Private agricultural suppliers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Farmers and ranchers:
Private agricultural suppliers:
Agricultural input manufacturers:
Congressional agriculture committees:
Identified Costs
  • Department of Agriculture
  • USDA analysts
  • PRC-linked agricultural input suppliers
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
USDA analysts:
Federal taxpayers:
Department of Agriculture:
PRC-linked agricultural input suppliers:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 28, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.

Mar 10, 2025

Mrs. Hinson (for herself, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. Moolenaar, Ms. Tokuda, …

Mar 10, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

Mar 10, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Agriculture
4 mentions across 1 clause
+3 positive -1 negative

Agricultural input manufacturers, Farmers and ranchers, PRC-linked agricultural input suppliers

Positive-direction: Agricultural input manufacturers, Farmers and ranchers, Private agricultural suppliers

Negative-direction: PRC-linked agricultural input suppliers

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Department of Agriculture

Government Employees
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

USDA analysts

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Agriculture Supply Chains National Security

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology