HR1928-119

In Committee

Sanctuary City Accountability Act

119th Congress Introduced Mar 6, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Sanctuary City Accountability Act creates civil liability for sanctuary jurisdictions. A U.S. national may sue a state or local government in federal district court when an alien who was located in that sanctuary jurisdiction commits a crime against the plaintiff or an immediate family member, either in that jurisdiction or in another jurisdiction after relocating. Remedies can include injunctive relief and compensatory damages. The bill defines sanctuary jurisdiction as a state or local government whose laws or practices obstruct immigration enforcement and shield criminals from ICE, including refusal to comply with detainers, unreasonable detainer conditions, denial of ICE access to interview incarcerated aliens, or interference with communication and information exchange with federal immigration officers. A local government is not liable for enforcing a state-imposed policy.

Who Benefits and How

U.S. crime victims benefit because they receive a federal damages and injunction route against sanctuary jurisdictions tied to the alleged offender's location. Immediate family members of victims benefit because the right of action reaches crimes against close relatives. ICE officials benefit indirectly because sanctuary jurisdictions face litigation pressure to comply with detainers and information requests. Immigration enforcement advocates benefit from a private enforcement mechanism that does not depend solely on federal agency action.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Sanctuary jurisdictions face damages suits and injunction requests if their policies are linked to an offender's location. State governments imposing sanctuary policies may shift liability dynamics because local governments are protected when following state law. Federal district courts must hear and manage the new civil actions. Immigrant defendants and affected communities may face increased pressure on localities to cooperate with ICE.

Key Provisions

  • Creates a private federal right of action against sanctuary jurisdictions.
  • Allows U.S. nationals to seek injunctive relief or compensatory damages after specified crimes by aliens located in sanctuary jurisdictions.
  • Defines sanctuary jurisdiction through ICE detainer refusal, access denial, and information-sharing obstruction.
  • Protects local governments from liability for enforcing state-imposed sanctuary policies.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a federal private right of action allowing U.S. nationals to sue sanctuary jurisdictions for injunctive relief or compensatory damages when an alien located in that sanctuary jurisdiction commits a crime against them or an immediate family member there or after relocating.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration, Civil Litigation, Local Government

Primary Purpose

Creates a federal private right of action allowing U.S. nationals to sue sanctuary jurisdictions for injunctive relief or compensatory damages when an alien located in that sanctuary jurisdiction commits a crime against them or an immediate family member there or after relocating.

Policy Domains

Immigration Civil Litigation Local Government

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • U.S. crime victims
  • Victims' immediate family members
  • ICE officials
  • Immigration enforcement advocates
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
ICE officials:
U.S. crime victims:
Immigration enforcement advocates:
Victims' immediate family members:
Identified Costs
  • Sanctuary jurisdictions
  • State governments imposing sanctuary policies
  • Federal district courts
  • Immigrant communities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Immigrant communities:
Federal district courts:
Sanctuary jurisdictions:
State governments imposing sanctuary policies:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 6, 2025

Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Gill of Texas, Mr. Crane, …

Mar 6, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Mar 6, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

General Public
4 mentions across 2 clauses
?4 uncertain

U.S. crime victims, Victims' immediate family members

Immigration
4 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative ?2 uncertain

ICE officials, Immigrant communities

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Sanctuary jurisdictions

Courts
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Federal district courts

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Civil Litigation Local Government

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology