Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act turns an existing limited U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service mass-marking effort into a formal program. Congress finds that invasive species, food-web changes, and prey-species declines have made Great Lakes fishery management more difficult; that state and tribal fish managers working through the Council of Lake Committees of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission use mass marking to distinguish hatchery-produced fish from wild fish; that the existing program tags about 9 million to 11 million hatchery-produced fish each year; and that federal, state, and tribal agencies stock about 21 million hatchery-produced fish annually to support native species recovery and recreational and commercial fishing. The bill establishes the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program in USFWS, lets the Director buy equipment, fish tags, data-processing tools, and related items and hire personnel, requires collaboration with federal, state, and tribal fish management agencies, the Council of Lake Committees, and Joint Strategic Plan signatories, and requires program data to be shared with fish managers. It authorizes $2.7 million per year for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Who Benefits and How
Great Lakes state fish management agencies in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Wisconsin, tribal fish management agencies, the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, the Council of Lake Committees, USFWS fishery staff, fish hatcheries, recreational fisheries, commercial fisheries, tribal fishing communities, fish-tagging equipment manufacturers, and Great Lakes restoration planners benefit from better data on how many stocked fish survive, whether hatchery operations are effective, how stocking affects predator-prey balance, and whether habitat restoration is working.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Great Lakes Mass Marking Program administrators, federal fishery staff, state fish management agencies, tribal fish management agencies, data-processing staff, tag-recovery crews, budget officers, and federal taxpayers must administer the program, coordinate across jurisdictions, purchase fish tags and automated equipment, hire personnel, disseminate data, and fund the $2.7 million annual authorization for five fiscal years.
Key Provisions
- Establishes the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program inside the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
- Authorizes the Director to buy tagging equipment, fish tags, expendable items, and data-processing tools and to hire additional personnel.
- Requires collaboration with federal, state, and tribal fish managers, the Council of Lake Committees, and Joint Strategic Plan signatories.
- Requires collected data to support restoration objectives, predator-prey balance, fisheries economics, and habitat-restoration evaluation.
- Authorizes $2.7 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Establishes the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to tag hatchery-produced fish, coordinate with Great Lakes state, tribal, and regional fishery managers, share data for stocking and restoration decisions, and authorize $2.7 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Key Policy Areas
Fisheries, Natural Resources, Federal Grants
Primary Purpose
Establishes the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to tag hatchery-produced fish, coordinate with Great Lakes state, tribal, and regional fishery managers, share data for stocking and restoration decisions, and authorize $2.7 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Great Lakes state fish management agencies
- Tribal fish management agencies
- Great Lakes Fishery Commission
- Council of Lake Committees
- USFWS fishery staff
- Fish hatcheries
- Recreational fisheries
- Commercial fisheries
- Tribal fishing communities
- Fish-tagging equipment manufacturers
Identified Costs
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- Great Lakes Mass Marking Program administrators
- Federal fishery staff
- State fish management agencies
- Tribal fish management agencies
- Data-processing staff
- Tag-recovery crews
- Budget officers
- Federal taxpayers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseReceived; read twice and referred to theCommittee on Environment and …
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Passed House (inferred from eh version)
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3543-3544)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were …
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3545)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Great Lakes Fishery Commission, Great Lakes Mass Marking Program, Tribal fish management agencies
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "program"
- → Great Lakes Mass Marking Program
- "director"
- → Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology