HR1892-119

In Committee

Wireless Electric Vehicle Charging Grant Program Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Mar 5, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Wireless EV Charging Grant Program Act directs the Transportation Secretary, in coordination with the Energy Secretary, to run competitive grants for wireless electric vehicle charging infrastructure and technology. Eligible entities include state, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, metropolitan planning organizations, public authorities with transportation functions, and transit agencies. Projects may cover roads, parking lots, airports, coastal and inland ports, light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicles, fleets, public transit, federal fleets, performance testing, safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and interoperability. Grants can pay up to 80 percent of project cost and no more than $25 million per grant. The bill prioritizes low-income, underserved, and disadvantaged communities; cost-effective, energy-efficient, sustainable, interoperable, safe, weather-ready projects; inclusive workforce and business practices; nonfederal leverage; medium- and heavy-duty fleets; and battery-life benefits. It applies Davis-Bacon, labor neutrality and NLRA notices, Buy America requirements, annual reporting, technical assistance, and $250 million available until expended.

Who Benefits and How

State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments benefit from new competitive funding for wireless EV charging projects. Transit agencies and public fleets benefit because buses, fleet vehicles, federal fleets, and medium- and heavy-duty vehicles are explicitly eligible use cases. Wireless EV charging companies benefit from federally funded deployment, testing, interoperability, and safety work. Low-income, underserved, and disadvantaged communities benefit from priority criteria steering projects toward historically underinvested areas. Construction workers benefit from Davis-Bacon wage protections and workforce-development eligibility.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Department of Transportation must administer grants, reports, technical assistance, project selection, and compliance monitoring. The Department of Energy must coordinate technical and energy aspects of the program. Grant recipients must satisfy Buy America, labor neutrality, reporting, outreach, safety, interoperability, and nonfederal match obligations. Federal taxpayers fund the $250 million authorization and up to 80 percent of project costs.

Key Provisions

  • Creates DOT competitive grants for wireless EV charging infrastructure and technology coordinated with DOE.
  • Authorizes eligible public entities, transit agencies, roads, parking lots, airports, ports, fleets, and public transit projects.
  • Limits grants to an 80 percent federal share and $25 million per grant.
  • Requires annual reports, technical assistance, Davis-Bacon, labor neutrality, Buy America compliance, and community-focused priority criteria.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a $250 million DOT grant program, coordinated with DOE, for wireless electric-vehicle charging infrastructure and technology, with eligible public entities, an 80 percent federal share, a $25 million grant cap, Buy America and Davis-Bacon conditions, labor neutrality, and priority criteria for underserved communities, interoperability, fleet uses, and domestic supply chains.

Key Policy Areas

Transportation, Electric Vehicles, Energy, Grants

Primary Purpose

Creates a $250 million DOT grant program, coordinated with DOE, for wireless electric-vehicle charging infrastructure and technology, with eligible public entities, an 80 percent federal share, a $25 million grant cap, Buy America and Davis-Bacon conditions, labor neutrality, and priority criteria for underserved communities, interoperability, fleet uses, and domestic supply chains.

Policy Domains

Transportation Electric Vehicles Energy Grants

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • State transportation agencies
  • Transit agencies
  • Wireless EV charging companies
  • Disadvantaged communities
  • Construction workers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Transit agencies: , , , , ,
Construction workers: , , , , ,
Disadvantaged communities: , , , , ,
State transportation agencies: , , , , ,
Wireless EV charging companies: , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Department of Transportation
  • Department of Energy
  • Grant recipients
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Grant recipients: , , , , ,
Federal taxpayers: , , , , ,
Department of Energy: , , , , ,
Department of Transportation: , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 5, 2025

Ms. Stevens (for herself, Ms. Barragán, Mrs. Dingell, and Ms. …

Mar 5, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

Mar 5, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in …

Mar 5, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
14 mentions across 7 clauses
-14 negative

Department of Transportation, Grant recipients

State & Local Government
7 mentions across 7 clauses
+7 positive

State transportation agencies

General Public
7 mentions across 7 clauses
+7 positive

Transit agencies

Automotive
7 mentions across 7 clauses
+7 positive

Wireless EV charging companies

Environment
7 mentions across 7 clauses
+7 positive

Disadvantaged communities

Labor
7 mentions across 7 clauses
+7 positive

Construction workers

Taxpayers
7 mentions across 7 clauses
-7 negative

Taxpayers

8/9
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Transportation Electric Vehicles Energy Grants

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology