HR1866-119

Introduced

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to disqualify any State that discriminates against parents or guardians who oppose medical, surgical, pharmacological, psychological treatment, or clothing and social changes related to affirming the subjective claims of gender identity expressed by any minor if such claimed identity is inconsistent with such minor’s biological sex from receiving funding under such Act.

119th Congress Introduced Mar 5, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill expands a appropriation, grant, compliance mandate provision: 2 and expands a appropriation, grant, compliance mandate provision: 4. It relies on appropriations, grants, and compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Healthcare.

Who Benefits and How

The available clause analysis does not identify a specific beneficiary group.

Who Bears the Burden and How

No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.

Key Provisions

  • Expands a appropriation, grant, compliance mandate provision: 2.
  • Expands a appropriation, grant, compliance mandate provision: 4.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for primary purpose and policy domains.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill expands a appropriation, grant, compliance mandate provision: 2 and expands a appropriation, grant, compliance mandate provision: 4.

Key Policy Areas

Healthcare

Primary Purpose

The bill expands a appropriation, grant, compliance mandate provision: 2 and expands a appropriation, grant, compliance mandate provision: 4.

Policy Domains

Healthcare

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 5, 2025

Ms. Hageman (for herself, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Grothman, …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Healthcare
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ The Secretary identified in the operative section

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology