HR1856-119

In Committee

CASE LOAD Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Mar 5, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The CASE LOAD Act addresses the Eastern District of California's unusually heavy caseload. The findings say the district covers 34 counties, five of California's fastest-growing cities, about 8.4 million residents, and more than 87,000 square miles, but has only six permanent judgeships and had 1,308 pending cases per judgeship in June 2022. The bill creates staged new judgeships: two additional Eastern District judges appointed by the President with Senate confirmation on or after January 21, 2027, raising the statutory count to eight; one more on or after January 5, 2029, raising it to nine; and two more on or after January 21, 2031, raising it to eleven. It amends the California district judgeship table in title 28 for each phase and authorizes such sums as necessary for the judgeships, space, and facilities.

Who Benefits and How

Eastern District of California litigants benefit because more judges can reduce delays in civil and criminal cases. Federal district judges in the Eastern District benefit from lower per-judge caseload pressure. Central Valley and inland California residents benefit from added judicial capacity in a fast-growing district. Attorneys practicing in the district benefit from more available court time and potentially faster case management.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The President must nominate and the Senate must confirm five additional judges over the staged schedule. The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts must plan staff, chambers, courtroom, and facility needs. Federal taxpayers bear the cost of judgeships, staff, space, and facilities. Judiciary committees must evaluate nominees and the policy choice to expand one district's bench.

Key Provisions

  • Creates two additional Eastern District of California judgeships in 2027.
  • Creates one additional Eastern District judgeship in 2029.
  • Creates two additional Eastern District judgeships in 2031.
  • Authorizes appropriations for judicial positions, space, and facilities.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Adds five permanent district judgeships for the Eastern District of California in stages: two judges on or after January 21, 2027, one judge on or after January 5, 2029, and two judges on or after January 21, 2031, while authorizing funds for courtroom space and facilities.

Key Policy Areas

Federal Courts, California, Judgeships

Primary Purpose

Adds five permanent district judgeships for the Eastern District of California in stages: two judges on or after January 21, 2027, one judge on or after January 5, 2029, and two judges on or after January 21, 2031, while authorizing funds for courtroom space and facilities.

Policy Domains

Federal Courts California Judgeships

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Eastern District of California litigants
  • Federal district judges
  • Central Valley residents
  • District court attorneys
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal district judges: ,
Central Valley residents: ,
District court attorneys: ,
Eastern District of California litigants: ,
Identified Costs
  • President of the United States
  • Senate Judiciary Committee
  • Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers: ,
Senate Judiciary Committee: ,
President of the United States: ,
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 5, 2025

Mr. Costa (for himself and Mr. Obernolte) introduced the following …

Mar 5, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Mar 5, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Courts
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+4 positive

Eastern District of California litigants, Federal district judges

Rural Communities
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Central Valley residents

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts

Taxpayers
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Taxpayers

2/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Federal Courts California Judgeships

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology