HR1811-119

Introduced

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide an Inspector General for the judicial branch, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Mar 3, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill strengthens oversight of Hatch Act enforcement by requiring the Office of Special Counsel to report more frequently to Congress and publish enforcement statistics online. It creates a distinction between career federal employees and political appointees (noncareer employees) to track whether Hatch Act violations are being enforced equally across both groups.

Who Benefits and How

Career federal employees benefit from greater transparency that may reveal if political appointees receive more lenient treatment for the same violations. Watchdog groups and the public gain access to demographic data and enforcement statistics that will be published on the OSC website for at least 10 years. Congressional oversight committees receive detailed reports every 180 days including complaint copies, employee names, and positions.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Office of Special Counsel faces significantly increased reporting and data collection requirements, including tracking demographic information and publishing detailed statistics. The Office of Personnel Management and agency heads must provide demographic data upon request. Political appointees (noncareer employees) face increased scrutiny as their Hatch Act enforcement outcomes will be separately tracked and reported to Congress, including detailed explanations when the Special Counsel declines to prosecute.

Key Provisions

  • Requires 180-day reports to Congress on Hatch Act complaints, including names and positions of accused employees
  • Mandates annual reports specifically on allegations against political appointees with confidential addenda
  • Requires public website publication of enforcement statistics broken down by career vs. noncareer status with demographic data
  • Requires written explanation when Special Counsel declines to prosecute noncareer employees found to have violated the Hatch Act

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Increases transparency and accountability in Hatch Act enforcement by requiring detailed public reporting on investigations and disciplinary actions, with particular focus on tracking enforcement against political appointees versus career employees.

Key Policy Areas

Government Operations, Ethics & Transparency, Federal Workforce

Primary Purpose

Increases transparency and accountability in Hatch Act enforcement by requiring detailed public reporting on investigations and disciplinary actions, with particular focus on tracking enforcement against political appointees versus career employees.

Policy Domains

Government Operations Ethics & Transparency Federal Workforce

Main Body - Hatch Act Enforcement Transparency

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Career federal employees
  • Government accountability organizations
  • Congressional oversight committees
  • The general public
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Office of Special Counsel
  • Office of Personnel Management
  • Noncareer employees (political appointees)
  • Federal agency heads
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 3, 2025

Ms. Stansbury (for herself, Ms. Tokuda, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Cleaver, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Federal Courts
12 mentions across 6 clauses
+2 positive -9 negative ?1 uncertain

Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Chief Justice of the United States, Federal Judges

Positive-direction: Judicial Branch Employees

Negative-direction: Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Federal Judges, Federal Judges (non-Supreme Court), Federal Judiciary, Judicial Conference of the United States, Supreme Court Justices

General Public
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive
Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive ?1 uncertain

Attorney General, Congress

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Audit and Investigation Services Providers

6/8
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Government Operations Ethics & Transparency Federal Workforce
Actor Mappings
"the_board"
→ Merit Systems Protection Board
"the_director"
→ Director of the Office of Personnel Management
"the_special_counsel"
→ Special Counsel (Office of Special Counsel)

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"career employee" §2_career

An individual who is an employee as defined in section 7322 and is not a noncareer employee

"covered allegation" §2_covered

An allegation concerning political activity prohibited under subchapter III of chapter 73 (Hatch Act violations)

"noncareer employee" §2_noncareer

An employee serving in the executive branch who was appointed by the President (including noncareer appointees, positions comparable to SES without merit-based procedures, and certain other political positions), excluding uniformed service members and career Foreign Service

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology