HR1770-119

Passed House

Consumer Safety Technology Act

119th Congress Introduced Mar 3, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Consumer Safety Technology Act combines three technology-focused consumer-protection measures. Title I requires the Consumer Product Safety Commission to establish an artificial-intelligence pilot within one year to support its Consumer Product Safety Act mission. The pilot may use AI to track injury trends involving consumer products, identify product hazards, monitor online and retail marketplaces for recalled products, and identify imported products that should be refused admission under section 17(a). CPSC must consult technologists, data scientists, AI and machine-learning experts, cybersecurity experts, retailers, consumer product manufacturers, consumer product safety organizations, and others, then report the pilot findings and whether AI improved the Commission's mission. Title II requires the Commerce Secretary, in consultation with the Federal Trade Commission and other agencies, to study blockchain uses for preventing or mitigating consumer fraud and unfair or deceptive practices, seek public comment, and publish a report within six months after the study. Title III states congressional findings on tokens and FTC enforcement, then requires an FTC report on token-related unfair or deceptive practices and recommendations for better consumer protection in the token marketplace.

Who Benefits and How

The Consumer Product Safety Commission, CPSC investigators, consumers, parents buying children's products, product-safety organizations, artificial-intelligence vendors, data scientists, cybersecurity specialists, the Department of Commerce, the Federal Trade Commission, blockchain developers, anti-fraud technology firms, token investors, token users, and congressional commerce committees benefit from structured pilots and reports that test whether AI and blockchain tools can detect hazards, recalled products, fraudulent transactions, and deceptive token-market practices.

Who Bears the Burden and How

CPSC program staff, Commerce Department study staff, FTC consumer-protection staff, retailers, consumer product manufacturers, blockchain companies, cryptocurrency platforms, token marketplaces, cybersecurity experts, AI researchers, public-comment administrators, and congressional report reviewers must design pilots, provide technical consultation, compile study evidence, respond to public comment, publish reports, and face more visible federal scrutiny of consumer-safety and token-market risks.

Key Provisions

  • Requires CPSC to establish an AI pilot program within one year for product-safety work.
  • Authorizes AI uses for injury-trend tracking, hazard identification, recalled-product monitoring, and import-screening support.
  • Requires CPSC consultation with technologists, data scientists, cybersecurity experts, retailers, manufacturers, and product-safety organizations.
  • Requires Commerce, with FTC consultation, to study blockchain uses for preventing fraud and unfair or deceptive practices.
  • Requires public comment and public Commerce reporting on blockchain consumer-protection uses.
  • Requires FTC reporting and legislative recommendations on token-related unfair or deceptive practices.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a CPSC artificial-intelligence pilot for consumer-product-safety work, requires Commerce and FTC study and public reporting on blockchain tools for consumer protection, and requires FTC reporting and recommendations on token-related unfair or deceptive practices.

Key Policy Areas

Consumer Protection, Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Assets

Primary Purpose

Creates a CPSC artificial-intelligence pilot for consumer-product-safety work, requires Commerce and FTC study and public reporting on blockchain tools for consumer protection, and requires FTC reporting and recommendations on token-related unfair or deceptive practices.

Policy Domains

Consumer Protection Technology Artificial Intelligence Digital Assets

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Consumer Product Safety Commission
  • CPSC investigators
  • Consumers
  • Product-safety organizations
  • Artificial-intelligence vendors
  • Data scientists
  • Department of Commerce
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Blockchain developers
  • Token investors
  • Congressional commerce committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Consumers: , , ,
Data scientists: , , ,
Token investors: , , ,
CPSC investigators: , , ,
Blockchain developers: , , ,
Department of Commerce: , , ,
Federal Trade Commission: , , ,
Product-safety organizations: , , ,
Artificial-intelligence vendors: , , ,
Congressional commerce committees: , , ,
Consumer Product Safety Commission: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • CPSC program staff
  • Commerce Department study staff
  • FTC consumer-protection staff
  • Retailers
  • Consumer product manufacturers
  • Blockchain companies
  • Cryptocurrency platforms
  • Token marketplaces
  • Public-comment administrators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Retailers: , , ,
CPSC program staff: , , ,
Token marketplaces: , , ,
Blockchain companies: , , ,
Cryptocurrency platforms: , , ,
FTC consumer-protection staff: , , ,
Public-comment administrators: , , ,
Consumer product manufacturers: , , ,
Commerce Department study staff: , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 15, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, …

Jul 15, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Jul 15, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Jul 14, 2025

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3212-3214)

Jul 14, 2025

Mr. Latta moved to suspend the rules and pass the …

Jul 14, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Jul 14, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill …

Jul 14, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …

Jul 14, 2025

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3231)

Jul 14, 2025

At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -5 negative

Congressional commerce committees, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Department of Commerce

Positive-direction: Congressional commerce committees

Negative-direction: Consumer Product Safety Commission, Department of Commerce, Federal Trade Commission, Public-comment administrators

Technology
5 mentions across 2 clauses
+5 positive

Anti-fraud technology firms, Artificial-intelligence vendors, Blockchain developers

General Public
4 mentions across 3 clauses
+4 positive

Consumers, Token investors, Token users

Financial Services
2 mentions across 1 clause
~2 mixed

Cryptocurrency platforms, Token marketplaces

Retail
1 mention across 1 clause
~1 mixed

Retailers

Manufacturing
1 mention across 1 clause
~1 mixed

Consumer product manufacturers

Nonprofits
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Product-safety organizations

5/9
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown
House Roll #192

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass

Consumer Safety Technology Act

Passed
336 Yea 36 Nay 59 Not Voting
Jul 14, 2025

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Consumer Protection Technology Artificial Intelligence Digital Assets
Actor Mappings
"ftc"
→ Federal Trade Commission
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Commerce
"commission"
→ Consumer Product Safety Commission

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

2 terms
"consumer product" §2(1)

Has the Consumer Product Safety Act section 3(a) meaning.

"token" §2(3)

A transferable digital representation of information recorded on a blockchain or distributed ledger.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology