HR1765-119

Passed House

Promoting United States Wireless Leadership Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Mar 3, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Promoting United States Wireless Leadership Act of 2025 tells the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information, who leads NTIA, to strengthen U.S. leadership in communications standards bodies for 5G and future wireless networks. In consultation with the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Department of State, the Assistant Secretary must equitably encourage participation by companies and other relevant stakeholders in standards-setting bodies and offer technical expertise to help them participate. The support excludes any company or stakeholder the Assistant Secretary determines is not trusted. Covered standards bodies include the International Organization for Standardization, voluntary standards bodies that develop protocols for wireless devices and equipment such as 3GPP and IEEE, and bodies accredited by the American National Standards Institute or the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions. Within 60 days, the Assistant Secretary must brief House Energy and Commerce, House Foreign Affairs, Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and Senate Foreign Relations on the implementation strategy. The bill defines 5G by 3GPP Release 15 or higher and defines not trusted by relying only on specified federal national-security determinations, including Federal Acquisition Security Council determinations, Commerce determinations under Executive Order 13873 on ICT supply-chain security, and covered telecommunications equipment or services under section 889 of the FY2019 NDAA.

Who Benefits and How

U.S. telecommunications companies, U.S. wireless equipment manufacturers, semiconductor companies, cloud-computing providers, standards engineers, 3GPP participants, IEEE participants, ANSI-accredited standards participants, Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions members, NTIA staff, NIST technical experts, State Department technology diplomats, and congressional commerce and foreign-affairs committees benefit from federal encouragement, technical expertise, and a clearer strategy for U.S. influence in global wireless standards.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The NTIA Assistant Secretary, National Institute of Standards and Technology staff, State Department technology-policy staff, Commerce Department national-security reviewers, Federal Acquisition Security Council participants, untrusted telecommunications equipment providers, covered communications-network vendors, foreign firms subject to ICT supply-chain determinations, and congressional briefing staff must implement trust determinations, withhold federal support from not-trusted stakeholders, coordinate technical assistance, and prepare a 60-day strategy briefing.

Key Provisions

  • Requires NTIA to encourage U.S. company and stakeholder participation in 5G and future wireless standards bodies.
  • Requires NTIA, NIST, and State to offer technical expertise to trusted participants.
  • Excludes companies and stakeholders determined not trusted from federal participation support.
  • Defines relevant standards bodies to include ISO, 3GPP, IEEE, ANSI-accredited bodies, and Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions bodies.
  • Requires congressional implementation strategy briefings within 60 days.
  • Limits not-trusted determinations to specified federal national-security findings and covered telecommunications equipment or services.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Directs the NTIA Assistant Secretary, with NIST and the State Department, to promote U.S. participation and technical expertise in 5G and future wireless standards-setting bodies while excluding companies and stakeholders determined not trusted based on specified national-security determinations, and requires congressional strategy briefings within 60 days.

Key Policy Areas

Telecommunications, Technology, National Security

Primary Purpose

Directs the NTIA Assistant Secretary, with NIST and the State Department, to promote U.S. participation and technical expertise in 5G and future wireless standards-setting bodies while excluding companies and stakeholders determined not trusted based on specified national-security determinations, and requires congressional strategy briefings within 60 days.

Policy Domains

Telecommunications Technology National Security

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • U.S. telecommunications companies
  • U.S. wireless equipment manufacturers
  • Semiconductor companies
  • Cloud-computing providers
  • Standards engineers
  • 3GPP participants
  • IEEE participants
  • NTIA staff
  • NIST technical experts
  • State Department technology diplomats
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rfs
NTIA staff: ,
3GPP participants: ,
IEEE participants: ,
Standards engineers: ,
NIST technical experts: ,
Semiconductor companies: ,
Cloud-computing providers: ,
U.S. telecommunications companies: ,
State Department technology diplomats: ,
U.S. wireless equipment manufacturers: ,
Identified Costs
  • NTIA Assistant Secretary
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology staff
  • State Department technology-policy staff
  • Commerce Department national-security reviewers
  • Federal Acquisition Security Council participants
  • Untrusted telecommunications equipment providers
  • Covered communications-network vendors
  • Congressional briefing staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rfs
NTIA Assistant Secretary: ,
Congressional briefing staff: ,
Covered communications-network vendors: ,
State Department technology-policy staff: ,
Commerce Department national-security reviewers: ,
Untrusted telecommunications equipment providers: ,
Federal Acquisition Security Council participants: ,
National Institute of Standards and Technology staff: ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 15, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, …

Jul 15, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Jul 15, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Jul 14, 2025

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3220-3221)

Jul 14, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Jul 14, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …

Jul 14, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …

Jul 14, 2025

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …

Jul 14, 2025

Mr. Latta moved to suspend the rules and pass the …

Jul 10, 2025

Committee on Foreign Affairs discharged.

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
12 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive -9 negative

Congressional commerce committees, Department of State, NTIA Assistant Secretary

Positive-direction: Congressional commerce committees

Negative-direction: Department of State, NTIA Assistant Secretary, National Institute of Standards and Technology

Technology
9 mentions across 3 clauses
+9 positive

Semiconductor companies, Standards engineers, U.S. wireless equipment manufacturers

Telecommunications
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive -3 negative

U.S. telecommunications companies, Untrusted telecommunications equipment providers

Positive-direction: U.S. telecommunications companies

Negative-direction: Untrusted telecommunications equipment providers

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Telecommunications Technology National Security
Actor Mappings
"nist"
→ National Institute of Standards and Technology
"state"
→ Department of State
"assistant_secretary"
→ Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology