HR1756-119

In Committee

Stop Politicians Profiting from War Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Feb 27, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Stop Politicians Profiting from War Act restricts congressional financial interests in the defense industry. It defines covered defense contractors as persons with Department of Defense contracts or agreements, excluding higher education institutions and nonprofit medical treatment facilities, and covers securities, commodities, futures, bonds, derivatives, hedge funds, options, and other complex investment vehicles tied to covered defense contractors or defense industrial base entities. Members of Congress, spouses, and dependent children may not own or trade those interests except divestment. Current members and families generally must divest within 120 days, or 180 days for hedge funds, venture capital funds, or other privately held complex vehicles; new members and families face similar deadlines. Blind trusts do not count as divestment. Exceptions include diversified widely held funds, Alaska Native settlement stock, U.S. Treasury securities, government retirement plan funds, and diversified registered investment company funds. The Attorney General or Special Counsel can seek civil penalties up to $50,000 per violation, the tax code is amended to allow deferral treatment for required divestments, and House and Senate ethics committees must issue interpretive guidance.

Who Benefits and How

Government ethics watchdog organizations benefit from a direct ban on congressional defense contractor stock conflicts. Taxpayers concerned about defense procurement benefit if lawmakers have less personal financial exposure to defense contractors. Diversified retirement investors benefit because broad funds and government retirement plan investments remain permitted. Congressional ethics committees benefit from explicit guidance authority over undefined terms.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Members of Congress must divest covered defense contractor and defense industrial base financial interests. Spouses and dependent children of Members of Congress face ownership and trading restrictions. Defense contractor investors lose a direct-investment option while serving in or closely tied to Congress. Attorney General and Special Counsel offices must enforce civil penalties for violations.

Key Provisions

  • Bars Members of Congress, spouses, and dependent children from owning or trading covered defense contractor interests.
  • Requires divestment within 120 days, or 180 days for privately held complex investment vehicles.
  • Provides that qualified or other blind trusts do not count as divestment.
  • Creates exceptions for diversified funds, Treasury securities, government retirement plans, and Alaska Native settlement stock.
  • Creates civil penalties up to $50,000 per violation and tax-deferral treatment for required divestments.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Bars Members of Congress, spouses, and dependent children from owning or trading financial interests tied to covered defense contractors or defense industrial base entities, requires divestment, excludes blind trusts as divestment, and creates civil penalties and tax-deferral treatment for required sales.

Key Policy Areas

Government Ethics, Defense Contractors, Financial Regulation

Primary Purpose

Bars Members of Congress, spouses, and dependent children from owning or trading financial interests tied to covered defense contractors or defense industrial base entities, requires divestment, excludes blind trusts as divestment, and creates civil penalties and tax-deferral treatment for required sales.

Policy Domains

Government Ethics Defense Contractors Financial Regulation

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Government ethics watchdog organizations
  • Taxpayers
  • Diversified retirement investors
  • Congressional ethics committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Taxpayers:
Congressional ethics committees:
Diversified retirement investors:
Government ethics watchdog organizations:
Identified Costs
  • Members of Congress
  • Spouses of Members of Congress
  • Defense contractor investors
  • Attorney General offices
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Members of Congress:
Attorney General offices:
Defense contractor investors:
Spouses of Members of Congress:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 28, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and …

Feb 27, 2025

Ms. Tlaib (for herself, Ms. Norton, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, …

Feb 27, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition …

Feb 27, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
-1 negative ?2 uncertain

Attorney General offices, Members of Congress, Spouses of Members of Congress

Nonprofits
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Government ethics watchdog organizations

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive
Foreign Entities
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Defense contractor investors

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Government Ethics Defense Contractors Financial Regulation

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology