HR1701-119

Passed House

Strategic Ports Reporting Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 27, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Strategic Ports Reporting Act requires the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, to create an updated global mapping of foreign and domestic ports important to the United States because they provide military, diplomatic, economic, or resource-exploration superiority. State and Defense must identify PRC government or PRC-entity efforts to build, buy, or otherwise control those ports and submit the mapping to congressional committees in unclassified form with a possible classified annex. The bill also requires State and Defense to study strategic ports, why they matter to the United States, PRC plans to expand control outside China, public and private actors such as China Ocean Shipping Company, PRC maritime logistics products such as LOGINK, industry-standard setting, national-security and economic harms to the United States and allies, and U.S. measures to ensure open access and alternatives to PRC stakes. State and Defense may use an FFRDC. Within one year, they must report detailed lists of PRC-controlled and U.S.-controlled strategic ports, vulnerabilities, PRC control tactics, replacement needs for PRC-owned products, costs, private and public funding sources including loans, loan guarantees, and tax incentives, additional authorities, and strategies for federal agencies to maintain access. The definition section identifies relevant U.S. offices including Unified Combatant Commands, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Office of the Secretary of State, U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and Maritime Administration.

Who Benefits and How

U.S. national-security planners, Unified Combatant Commands, Maritime Administration staff, U.S. port operators, allied port authorities, U.S. International Development Finance Corporation staff, intelligence analysts, congressional armed-services committees, congressional intelligence committees, and trusted maritime infrastructure investors benefit from a clearer map of port vulnerabilities, PRC ownership or operating links, alternative investment needs, and federal access strategies. The report can help policymakers target loans, loan guarantees, tax incentives, and trusted ownership structures at ports where PRC influence could threaten military or economic access.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The State Department, Department of Defense, FFRDC analysts, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Office of the Secretary of State, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Maritime Administration, DFC staff, China Ocean Shipping Company, PRC-linked port operators, LOGINK logistics providers, U.S. port operators, maritime infrastructure companies, and congressional committee staff must provide data, analyze control structures, assess vulnerabilities, estimate replacement costs, identify funding sources, and evaluate public and private investment alternatives.

Key Provisions

  • Requires State and Defense to map strategic ports worldwide and identify PRC efforts to build, buy, or control them.
  • Requires a study of strategic ports, PRC port-control plans, PRC maritime-logistics products such as LOGINK, and actors such as China Ocean Shipping Company.
  • Authorizes use of a federally funded research and development center for the study.
  • Requires a one-year report listing PRC-controlled and U.S.-controlled ports, vulnerabilities, strategic interests, and PRC influence tactics.
  • Requires a strategy for trusted investment, open access, replacement of PRC products, transparency, authorities, and public or private funding sources.
  • Defines relevant U.S. offices and strategic port for the reporting and strategy requirements.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires State and Defense to map strategic ports important to U.S. military, diplomatic, economic, or resource interests; identify PRC efforts to build, buy, or control those ports; study PRC port and maritime-logistics influence including China Ocean Shipping Company and LOGINK; and report within one year with port lists, vulnerability assessments, investment strategies, replacement costs, funding sources, and federal access strategies.

Key Policy Areas

National Security, Maritime, China, Infrastructure

Primary Purpose

Requires State and Defense to map strategic ports important to U.S. military, diplomatic, economic, or resource interests; identify PRC efforts to build, buy, or control those ports; study PRC port and maritime-logistics influence including China Ocean Shipping Company and LOGINK; and report within one year with port lists, vulnerability assessments, investment strategies, replacement costs, funding sources, and federal access strategies.

Policy Domains

National Security Maritime China Infrastructure

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Unified Combatant Commands
  • Maritime Administration staff
  • U.S. port operators
  • Allied port authorities
  • U.S. International Development Finance Corporation staff
  • Intelligence analysts
  • Trusted maritime infrastructure investors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
U.S. port operators: , ,
Intelligence analysts: , ,
Allied port authorities: , ,
Unified Combatant Commands: , ,
Maritime Administration staff: , ,
Trusted maritime infrastructure investors: , ,
U.S. International Development Finance Corporation staff: , ,
Identified Costs
  • State Department
  • Department of Defense
  • FFRDC analysts
  • Office of the Director of National Intelligence
  • China Ocean Shipping Company
  • PRC-linked port operators
  • LOGINK logistics providers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
FFRDC analysts: , ,
State Department: , ,
Department of Defense: , ,
PRC-linked port operators: , ,
LOGINK logistics providers: , ,
China Ocean Shipping Company: , ,
Office of the Director of National Intelligence: , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
May 22, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

May 22, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

May 22, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill …

May 22, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill …

May 22, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …

May 19, 2025

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2116-2119; text: …

May 19, 2025

At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question …

May 19, 2025

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …

May 19, 2025

Mr. Huizenga moved to suspend the rules and pass the …

Feb 27, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
6 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive -4 negative

Congressional armed-services committees, Department of Defense, State Department

Positive-direction: Congressional armed-services committees, Unified Combatant Commands

Negative-direction: Department of Defense, State Department

Transportation
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

China Ocean Shipping Company, PRC-linked port operators

Government Contractors
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

FFRDC analysts

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

LOGINK logistics providers

4/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
National Security Maritime China Infrastructure
Actor Mappings
"strategic_port"
→ An international port or waterway determined by relevant U.S. offices to be critical to U.S. national security or economic prosperity.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology