Strategic Ports Reporting Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Strategic Ports Reporting Act requires the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, to create an updated global mapping of foreign and domestic ports important to the United States because they provide military, diplomatic, economic, or resource-exploration superiority. State and Defense must identify PRC government or PRC-entity efforts to build, buy, or otherwise control those ports and submit the mapping to congressional committees in unclassified form with a possible classified annex. The bill also requires State and Defense to study strategic ports, why they matter to the United States, PRC plans to expand control outside China, public and private actors such as China Ocean Shipping Company, PRC maritime logistics products such as LOGINK, industry-standard setting, national-security and economic harms to the United States and allies, and U.S. measures to ensure open access and alternatives to PRC stakes. State and Defense may use an FFRDC. Within one year, they must report detailed lists of PRC-controlled and U.S.-controlled strategic ports, vulnerabilities, PRC control tactics, replacement needs for PRC-owned products, costs, private and public funding sources including loans, loan guarantees, and tax incentives, additional authorities, and strategies for federal agencies to maintain access. The definition section identifies relevant U.S. offices including Unified Combatant Commands, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Office of the Secretary of State, U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and Maritime Administration.
Who Benefits and How
U.S. national-security planners, Unified Combatant Commands, Maritime Administration staff, U.S. port operators, allied port authorities, U.S. International Development Finance Corporation staff, intelligence analysts, congressional armed-services committees, congressional intelligence committees, and trusted maritime infrastructure investors benefit from a clearer map of port vulnerabilities, PRC ownership or operating links, alternative investment needs, and federal access strategies. The report can help policymakers target loans, loan guarantees, tax incentives, and trusted ownership structures at ports where PRC influence could threaten military or economic access.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The State Department, Department of Defense, FFRDC analysts, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Office of the Secretary of State, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Maritime Administration, DFC staff, China Ocean Shipping Company, PRC-linked port operators, LOGINK logistics providers, U.S. port operators, maritime infrastructure companies, and congressional committee staff must provide data, analyze control structures, assess vulnerabilities, estimate replacement costs, identify funding sources, and evaluate public and private investment alternatives.
Key Provisions
- Requires State and Defense to map strategic ports worldwide and identify PRC efforts to build, buy, or control them.
- Requires a study of strategic ports, PRC port-control plans, PRC maritime-logistics products such as LOGINK, and actors such as China Ocean Shipping Company.
- Authorizes use of a federally funded research and development center for the study.
- Requires a one-year report listing PRC-controlled and U.S.-controlled ports, vulnerabilities, strategic interests, and PRC influence tactics.
- Requires a strategy for trusted investment, open access, replacement of PRC products, transparency, authorities, and public or private funding sources.
- Defines relevant U.S. offices and strategic port for the reporting and strategy requirements.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires State and Defense to map strategic ports important to U.S. military, diplomatic, economic, or resource interests; identify PRC efforts to build, buy, or control those ports; study PRC port and maritime-logistics influence including China Ocean Shipping Company and LOGINK; and report within one year with port lists, vulnerability assessments, investment strategies, replacement costs, funding sources, and federal access strategies.
Key Policy Areas
National Security, Maritime, China, Infrastructure
Primary Purpose
Requires State and Defense to map strategic ports important to U.S. military, diplomatic, economic, or resource interests; identify PRC efforts to build, buy, or control those ports; study PRC port and maritime-logistics influence including China Ocean Shipping Company and LOGINK; and report within one year with port lists, vulnerability assessments, investment strategies, replacement costs, funding sources, and federal access strategies.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Unified Combatant Commands
- Maritime Administration staff
- U.S. port operators
- Allied port authorities
- U.S. International Development Finance Corporation staff
- Intelligence analysts
- Trusted maritime infrastructure investors
Identified Costs
- State Department
- Department of Defense
- FFRDC analysts
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence
- China Ocean Shipping Company
- PRC-linked port operators
- LOGINK logistics providers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill …
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill …
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2116-2119; text: …
At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question …
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …
Mr. Huizenga moved to suspend the rules and pass the …
Passed House (inferred from eh version)
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Congressional armed-services committees, Department of Defense, State Department
Positive-direction: Congressional armed-services committees, Unified Combatant Commands
Negative-direction: Department of Defense, State Department
China Ocean Shipping Company, PRC-linked port operators
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "strategic_port"
- → An international port or waterway determined by relevant U.S. offices to be critical to U.S. national security or economic prosperity.
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology