HR1690-118

Reported

To authorize the Secretary of State to negotiate regional immigration agreements, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Mar 22, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The ORDER Act establishes U.S. policy to negotiate immigration enforcement agreements with Mexico, Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, and other Western Hemisphere countries. It requires the Secretary of State to pursue deals that would have Mexico accept and process asylum seekers from other countries, while also requiring regular congressional briefings on border security efforts.

Who Benefits and How

U.S. Immigration Enforcement Agencies benefit from reduced processing burden as asylum seekers would be processed in Mexico or their home countries rather than at the U.S. border. The Department of State gains expanded authority to negotiate immigration agreements. U.S. taxpayers potentially benefit from reduced costs associated with processing and detaining asylum seekers domestically.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Mexico would be required to accept and process asylum claims from non-Mexican nationals, creating significant administrative and financial obligations. Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala face similar obligations to accept returning nationals and process asylum claims. Asylum seekers may face longer waits and potentially less favorable conditions while their claims are processed outside the United States.

Key Provisions

  • Directs Secretary of State to negotiate burden-sharing agreements with Mexico and Central American nations on immigration enforcement
  • Requires Mexico to accept non-Mexican asylum seekers and process their claims within Mexico
  • Mandates 90-day congressional briefings on border security efforts until illegal immigration is certified as manageable

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Establishes U.S. policy for regional cooperation with Western Hemisphere countries on immigration enforcement and asylum processing, directing the Secretary of State to negotiate burden-sharing agreements with Mexico and Central American nations.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration, Foreign Affairs, National Security

Primary Purpose

Establishes U.S. policy for regional cooperation with Western Hemisphere countries on immigration enforcement and asylum processing, directing the Secretary of State to negotiate burden-sharing agreements with Mexico and Central American nations.

Policy Domains

Immigration Foreign Affairs National Security

ORDER Act - Immigration Cooperation

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • U.S. Immigration Enforcement Agencies
  • Department of State
  • U.S. Taxpayers
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Mexico
  • Central American Governments
  • Asylum Seekers
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
May 5, 2023

Additional sponsors: Mrs. Wagner, Mr. McCormick, Mr. Self, Mrs. Radewagen, …

May 5, 2023

Reported from the Committee on Foreign Affairs with an amendment

May 5, 2023

Committee on the Judiciary discharged; committed to the Committee of …

Mar 22, 2023

Mr. McCaul introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
22 mentions across 13 clauses
+10 positive -12 negative

Department of State, Department of State officials negotiating and administering regional immigration agreements, Department of State officials preparing recurring immigration-enforcement briefings

Department of State officials negotiating and administering regional immigration agreements, Department of State officials preparing recurring immigration-enforcement briefings, Department of State overseas building and Western Hemisphere affairs offices, House Foreign Affairs and Senate Foreign Relations committees, Mexican and regional law enforcement partners, Mexican, Honduran, Salvadoran, Guatemalan, and other regional governments, Western Hemisphere foreign governments asked to share migration enforcement responsibilities face effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: House Foreign Affairs Committee and Senate Foreign Relations Committee, U.S. Immigration Enforcement Agencies, U.S. Immigration and Border Protection agencies

Negative-direction: Department of State

Border Security
10 mentions across 10 clauses
+6 positive -4 negative

U.S. border and immigration enforcement operations, U.S. immigration enforcement agencies relying on regional processing and repatriation agreements, U.S. immigration enforcement and border agencies

U.S. border and immigration enforcement operations, U.S. immigration enforcement agencies relying on regional processing and repatriation agreements, U.S. immigration enforcement and border agencies, U.S. immigration enforcement policy oversight face effects in multiple directions

Immigrant Communities
6 mentions across 6 clauses
+2 positive -4 negative

Asylum seekers and migrants affected by regionalized processing, Asylum seekers and migrants required to wait or process claims outside the United States

Asylum seekers and migrants affected by regionalized processing, Asylum seekers and migrants required to wait or process claims outside the United States face effects in multiple directions

Foreign Aid Recipients
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

Foreign aid recipients running migration-reduction programs

Foreign aid recipients running migration-reduction programs faces effects in multiple directions

Foreign Entities
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

Government of Mexico, Governments of Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala

Transnational Criminal Organizations
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative

Transnational organized crime and drug trafficking organizations

Transnational organized crime and drug trafficking organizations faces effects in multiple directions

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Taxpayers

International Development Organizations
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Foreign aid programs lacking proven immigration reduction outcomes

4/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Foreign Affairs National Security
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of State
"appropriate_congressional_committees"
→ House Foreign Affairs Committee and Senate Foreign Relations Committee

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"appropriate congressional committees" §4

The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology