HR1680-119

In Committee

UPLIFT Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 27, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The UPLIFT Act is an immigration-enforcement cooperation bill. Its purpose section cites transnational criminal organizations such as Tren de Aragua, the Sinaloa Cartel, and MS-13 and says sanctuary jurisdictions should cooperate with the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security. It rewrites 8 U.S.C. 1373 to bar any federal, state, or local government entity or individual from restricting officials or personnel from complying with U.S. immigration laws or assisting federal enforcement. It also expands protected information-sharing and enforcement activities relating to citizenship, immigration status, inadmissibility, deportability, custody, release, and criminal history. Separately, it rewrites INA section 287(d) to authorize DHS detainers after arrests when the Secretary has probable cause to believe the person is inadmissible or deportable, including biometric matches, database records, ongoing removal proceedings, final removal orders, or other specified grounds.

Who Benefits and How

Department of Homeland Security immigration officers benefit because local and state personnel could not be barred from cooperation or assistance. Federal law enforcement agencies benefit from broader information-sharing and detainer authority. Immigration-enforcement supporters benefit because sanctuary policies are constrained by federal statute. Local residents concerned about transnational criminal organizations benefit if increased cooperation improves removal of arrested deportable individuals.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Sanctuary jurisdictions must repeal or ignore policies that restrict immigration-law cooperation. State and local law enforcement agencies must allow personnel to share information and assist federal immigration enforcement. Immigrant residents face increased detention or removal risk after arrests when DHS issues detainers. Local officials opposing federal immigration enforcement lose authority to limit personnel cooperation.

Key Provisions

  • Bars government entities and individuals from restricting cooperation with federal immigration laws.
  • Expands protected information-sharing and enforcement activities under 8 U.S.C. 1373.
  • Authorizes DHS detainers after arrests when probable cause supports inadmissibility or deportability.
  • Defines probable-cause grounds using biometric matches, federal databases, removal proceedings, and final removal orders.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Tightens federal immigration-cooperation rules for sanctuary jurisdictions and authorizes DHS immigration detainers based on specified probable-cause grounds after arrests for criminal or motor vehicle law violations.

Key Policy Areas

Immigration, Law Enforcement, Federalism

Primary Purpose

Tightens federal immigration-cooperation rules for sanctuary jurisdictions and authorizes DHS immigration detainers based on specified probable-cause grounds after arrests for criminal or motor vehicle law violations.

Policy Domains

Immigration Law Enforcement Federalism

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Department of Homeland Security officers
  • Federal law enforcement agencies
  • Immigration-enforcement supporters
  • Local residents
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Local residents: , ,
Federal law enforcement agencies: , ,
Immigration-enforcement supporters: , ,
Department of Homeland Security officers: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Sanctuary jurisdictions
  • State law enforcement agencies
  • Immigrant residents
  • Local officials
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Local officials: , ,
Immigrant residents: , ,
Sanctuary jurisdictions: , ,
State law enforcement agencies: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 27, 2025

Mr. Evans of Colorado (for himself, Mr. Crank, Ms. Boebert, …

Feb 27, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Feb 27, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Law Enforcement
9 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative ?6 uncertain

Department of Homeland Security officers, Federal law enforcement agencies, State law enforcement agencies

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
?3 uncertain

Sanctuary jurisdictions

Immigration
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Immigrant residents

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Immigration Law Enforcement Federalism

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology