HR1653-119

In Committee

Civil Investigative Demand Reform Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Feb 27, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Civil Investigative Demand Reform Act changes how the CFPB can use civil investigative demands before a formal proceeding begins. It amends the Consumer Financial Protection Act to require those demands to be issued no later than six years after the violation. It also requires the demand to identify the conduct under investigation with specific reference to particular facts, rather than using broad generic descriptions. Attorneys advising recipients may submit questions about the scope or breadth of the demand, and the Bureau must respond within 20 days or by the demand return date if that is sooner. The bill narrows CFPB investigative flexibility and gives recipients more notice, timing protection, and a formal way to challenge or clarify breadth early.

Who Benefits and How

Consumer finance companies benefit because stale or broadly framed CFPB demands become harder to issue and easier to contest. Small financial firms benefit from more specific factual notice before producing documents or testimony. Defense attorneys benefit because they gain a statutory channel for scope questions and a deadline for CFPB responses. Compliance officers benefit from clearer facts when deciding what records, custodians, and business practices are under review.

Who Bears the Burden and How

CFPB enforcement staff must screen civil investigative demands for the six-year limit and draft more fact-specific descriptions. CFPB attorneys must answer recipient questions about demand scope within the statutory deadline. Consumer protection investigators may lose leverage in older or broad-pattern investigations. Borrowers and consumers bear possible enforcement risk if the Bureau cannot investigate older misconduct through a civil investigative demand.

Key Provisions

  • Limits pre-proceeding civil investigative demands to violations within six years.
  • Requires CFPB demands to describe covered conduct with particular factual references.
  • Creates a process for attorneys to ask questions about demand scope or breadth.
  • Requires the Bureau to respond within 20 days or by the return date if earlier.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Limits Consumer Financial Protection Bureau civil investigative demands by adding a six-year timing limit, requiring fact-specific demand notices, and creating a Bureau response process for attorney questions about demand scope.

Key Policy Areas

Consumer Finance, Administrative Enforcement, Civil Procedure

Primary Purpose

Limits Consumer Financial Protection Bureau civil investigative demands by adding a six-year timing limit, requiring fact-specific demand notices, and creating a Bureau response process for attorney questions about demand scope.

Policy Domains

Consumer Finance Administrative Enforcement Civil Procedure

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Consumer finance companies
  • Small financial firms
  • Defense attorneys
  • Compliance officers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Defense attorneys:
Compliance officers:
Small financial firms:
Consumer finance companies:
Identified Costs
  • CFPB enforcement staff
  • CFPB attorneys
  • Consumer protection investigators
  • Borrowers and consumers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
CFPB attorneys:
CFPB enforcement staff:
Borrowers and consumers:
Consumer protection investigators:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 27, 2025

Mr. Barr (for himself, Mr. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, and …

Feb 27, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Feb 27, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
-1 negative ?1 uncertain

CFPB enforcement staff, Consumer protection investigators

Consumers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Consumer finance companies

Financial Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Small financial firms

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Defense attorneys

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Consumer Finance Administrative Enforcement Civil Procedure

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology