HR1536-119

In Committee

PIFAA

119th Congress Introduced Feb 24, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

PIFAA amends title 49 air-commerce rules for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. For foreign air carriers registered in Japan, the Philippines, or the Republic of Korea that hold the required U.S. permit, passengers or cargo added to or removed from an authorized Pacific aircraft in Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands would not be treated as breaking the international journey between a U.S. place and a foreign place. The bill is a targeted territorial aviation fix: it gives Pacific foreign carriers more flexibility to serve Guam International Airport Authority facilities and Commonwealth Ports Authority facilities as part of international routes without triggering domestic-cabotage treatment.

Who Benefits and How

Guam International Airport Authority facilities benefit if more international carriers can move passengers or cargo through Guam without cabotage barriers. Commonwealth Ports Authority facilities benefit from more flexible cargo and passenger routing through the Northern Mariana Islands. Japanese foreign air carriers benefit because qualifying international routes can add or remove passengers or cargo in the territories. Philippine foreign air carriers benefit from the same territorial stop flexibility when they hold the required U.S. permit.

Who Bears the Burden and How

U.S. air carriers may face added competition on Pacific routes that touch Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands. The Department of Transportation must administer the permit and cabotage interpretation for authorized Pacific aircraft. Guam airport inspectors must distinguish qualifying international journeys from prohibited domestic carriage. CNMI airport inspectors must coordinate any additional passenger or cargo operations if service expands.

Key Provisions

  • Amends air-commerce rules for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.
  • Authorizes qualifying foreign carriers from Japan, the Philippines, or Korea to add or remove passengers or cargo.
  • Clarifies that those territorial stops do not break the international journey for cabotage purposes.
  • Limits the flexibility to foreign carriers holding a permit under section 41302.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Clarifies that passengers or cargo added or removed in Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands by authorized Japanese, Philippine, or Korean foreign air carriers do not break an international journey under air-cabotage rules.

Key Policy Areas

Aviation, Territories, Transportation

Primary Purpose

Clarifies that passengers or cargo added or removed in Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands by authorized Japanese, Philippine, or Korean foreign air carriers do not break an international journey under air-cabotage rules.

Policy Domains

Aviation Territories Transportation

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Guam International Airport Authority
  • Commonwealth Ports Authority
  • Japanese foreign air carriers
  • Philippine foreign air carriers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Commonwealth Ports Authority:
Japanese foreign air carriers:
Philippine foreign air carriers:
Guam International Airport Authority:
Identified Costs
  • U.S. air carriers
  • Department of Transportation
  • Guam airport inspectors
  • CNMI airport inspectors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
U.S. air carriers:
CNMI airport inspectors:
Guam airport inspectors:
Department of Transportation:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 24, 2025

Mr. Moylan (for himself and Ms. King-Hinds) introduced the following …

Feb 24, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

Feb 24, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Feb 24, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Transportation
5 mentions across 1 clause
+4 positive -1 negative

Commonwealth Ports Authority, Guam International Airport Authority, Japanese foreign air carriers

Positive-direction: Commonwealth Ports Authority, Guam International Airport Authority, Japanese foreign air carriers, Philippine foreign air carriers

Negative-direction: U.S. air carriers

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Department of Transportation

1/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Aviation Territories Transportation

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology