HR1501-118

Passed House

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from operating or procuring certain foreign-made unmanned aircraft systems, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Mar 9, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

Prohibits DHS from operating, funding, or procuring unmanned aircraft systems (drones) manufactured in or with components from covered foreign countries, primarily targeting Chinese-made drones and systems.

Who Benefits and How

U.S. drone manufacturers gain protected market. National security benefits from reduced foreign technology in sensitive operations. Domestic supply chain development is encouraged.

Who Bears the Burden and How

DHS loses access to cost-effective foreign drones. Chinese drone manufacturers (like DJI) lose U.S. government business. DHS may face higher procurement costs.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits UAS manufactured in covered foreign countries
  • Covers flight controllers, cameras, data transmission from foreign sources
  • Includes ground control systems and operating software
  • Extends to drone detection/identification systems

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Prohibits DHS from using drones from covered foreign countries

Who Benefits

  • U.S. drone manufacturers
  • National security

Who Bears Costs

  • DHS
  • Chinese drone manufacturers

Key Policy Areas

Homeland Security, National Security, Procurement

Primary Purpose

Prohibits DHS from using drones from covered foreign countries

Policy Domains

Homeland Security National Security Procurement

Legislative Strategy

"Protect national security by banning foreign drones from DHS"

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 19, 2023

Additional sponsors: Ms. Lee of Florida, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Cuellar, …

Jul 19, 2023

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Mar 9, 2023

Mr. Guest (for himself, Mr. Green of Tennessee, Mr. Ezell, …

Mar 9, 2023 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Defense
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive -3 negative

Domestic UAS manufacturers, Foreign UAS manufacturers

Positive-direction: Domestic UAS manufacturers

Negative-direction: Foreign UAS manufacturers

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Department of Homeland Security

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Homeland Security National Security Procurement
Actor Mappings
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Homeland Security

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology