HR1415-119

In Committee

No IRIS Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Feb 18, 2025

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 18, 2025

Mr. Grothman (for himself, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. Guest, and Ms. …

Summary

What This Bill Does

The "No IRIS Act of 2025" prohibits the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from using scientific assessments generated by its Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program. IRIS is the EPA's database of toxicity assessments that evaluate health risks from exposure to chemicals found in industrial processes, products, and pollution. This bill would prevent EPA from relying on these scientific assessments when creating environmental regulations, enforcing pollution limits, issuing permits to polluting facilities, or developing air quality screening tools.

Who Benefits and How

Chemical manufacturers, petroleum refineries, and other industrial facilities that emit toxic pollutants would benefit significantly from this bill. These industries currently face EPA regulations based on IRIS toxicity assessments for chemicals like benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens. By prohibiting EPA from using IRIS data, these companies would face reduced regulatory scrutiny and weaker chemical safety standards. Pesticide manufacturers and mining operations that release chemicals assessed by IRIS would also gain reduced compliance burdens and potentially lower costs from avoiding more stringent environmental controls.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The EPA would lose a critical scientific tool for protecting public health, severely limiting its ability to regulate toxic chemicals based on peer-reviewed risk assessments. Communities living near industrial facilities, chemical plants, and refineries would face increased health risks from toxic air emissions that would no longer be regulated using IRIS toxicity data. Public health advocates and environmental organizations would bear the burden of fighting for chemical safety protections without the scientific backing of IRIS assessments. Ultimately, the general public's health protections from toxic chemical exposures would be weakened.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits EPA from using IRIS assessments to develop, finalize, or issue any rules or regulations
  • Prevents EPA from using IRIS data in any enforcement actions or permitting decisions for polluting facilities
  • Bars EPA from incorporating IRIS assessments into air toxics screening tools and pollution mapping systems
  • Creates a blanket prohibition overriding any other federal law that would allow IRIS use
  • Applies to all existing and future IRIS chemical risk assessments
Model: claude-opus-4-5-20251101
Generated: Dec 24, 2025 05:50

Evidence Chain:

This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

Primary Purpose

Prohibits the EPA from using Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessments in any rulemaking, enforcement, permitting, or screening activities

Policy Domains

Environmental Regulation Chemical Safety Public Health

Legislative Strategy

"Restrict EPA regulatory authority by prohibiting use of IRIS chemical risk assessments"

Likely Beneficiaries

  • Chemical manufacturers subject to EPA regulation
  • Oil and gas industry (refineries, processors)
  • Industrial facilities with toxic emissions
  • Mining companies
  • Pesticide manufacturers

Likely Burden Bearers

  • Environmental Protection Agency (reduced regulatory tools)
  • Public health advocates
  • Communities near industrial facilities
  • Environmental protection groups

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Environmental Regulation Chemical Safety
Actor Mappings
"the_administrator"
→ Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"Integrated Risk Information System program" §2

A program of the Environmental Protection Agency that generates assessments used in regulatory actions

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology