To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exclusion of gain from the sale of a principal residence, and for other purposes.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill requires increase of exclusion of gain from sale of principal residence Section 121(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— by striking $250,000 and inserting $500,000 each place it appears, by striking. It relies on definition changes, tax rate changes, and compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Regulated Industries.
Who Benefits and How
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face reduced risk.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties and Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Requires increase of exclusion of gain from sale of principal residence Section 121(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— by striking $250,000 and inserting $500,000 each place it appears, by striking...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill requires increase of exclusion of gain from sale of principal residence Section 121(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— by striking $250,000 and inserting $500,000 each place it appears, by striking.
Key Policy Areas
Regulated Industries
Primary Purpose
The bill requires increase of exclusion of gain from sale of principal residence Section 121(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— by striking $250,000 and inserting $500,000 each place it appears, by striking.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
- Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill
Sponsors
Jimmy Panetta
D-CA | Primary Sponsor
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Panetta (for himself and Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania) introduced …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology