HR1299-119

In Committee

EAGLES Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Feb 13, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The EAGLES Act responds to the 2018 Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School attack by codifying a National Threat Assessment Center operated by the United States Secret Service at the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security. The Center's functions include training and education on threat assessment and targeted violence prevention, consultation on complex threat cases and programs, research consistent with evidence-based standards, information sharing among agencies and organizations with protective or public-safety responsibilities, and development of evidence-based programs to standardize federal, state, and local threat assessments and prevention best practices. The bill turns Secret Service threat-assessment expertise into a formal national program for schools and other entities facing targeted violence risks.

Who Benefits and How

Schools benefit from threat-assessment training and evidence-based best practices aimed at preventing targeted violence. Secret Service threat assessment specialists benefit from statutory authority for the National Threat Assessment Center. State and local public safety agencies benefit from consultation and information sharing on complex threat cases. Families and students affected by targeted school violence benefit if prevention practices identify concerning behavior earlier.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Secret Service must operate the Center, provide training, consult on cases, conduct research, and share information. The Department of Homeland Security must oversee the Center through the Secretary's direction. Public and private entities using threat assessment must align with evidence-based standards and privacy laws. Federal taxpayers bear the cost of a national threat-assessment training and research program.

Key Provisions

  • Establishes the National Threat Assessment Center in statute under the United States Secret Service.
  • Requires training, education, consultation, research, and information sharing on targeted violence prevention.
  • Develops evidence-based programs to standardize threat assessments across federal, state, and local levels.
  • Uses lessons from the Parkland attack to support earlier identification of threatening behavior.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Establishes a Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center in statute to train, consult, research, share information, and standardize threat assessments for targeted violence prevention.

Key Policy Areas

Public Safety, School Safety, Homeland Security

Primary Purpose

Establishes a Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center in statute to train, consult, research, share information, and standardize threat assessments for targeted violence prevention.

Policy Domains

Public Safety School Safety Homeland Security

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Schools
  • Secret Service specialists
  • State public safety agencies
  • Families affected by school violence
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Schools: , ,
Secret Service specialists: , ,
State public safety agencies: , ,
Families affected by school violence: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Secret Service
  • Department of Homeland Security
  • Threat assessment programs
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Secret Service: , ,
Federal taxpayers: , ,
Threat assessment programs: , ,
Department of Homeland Security: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 13, 2025

Mr. Diaz-Balart (for himself and Mr. Moskowitz) introduced the following …

Feb 13, 2025

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition …

Feb 13, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Education
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Schools

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
?3 uncertain

State public safety agencies

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Secret Service

Taxpayers
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Taxpayers

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Public Safety School Safety Homeland Security

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology