HR1262-119

Passed House

Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 12, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act makes a package of FDA, NIH, transplant, and Medicare changes. It lets FDA require molecularly targeted pediatric cancer investigations not only for a sponsor's own adult cancer drug but also for combinations with already approved standard-of-care ingredients or same-sponsor adult cancer drugs aimed at pediatric-relevant molecular targets. It tightens pediatric-study noncompliance procedures, requires FDA reporting on PREA penalties and settlements, extends rare pediatric disease priority review voucher authority to September 30, 2029, directs GAO to study voucher effectiveness, narrows orphan-drug exclusivity to the approved use or indication, funds NIH pediatric drug studies at $25 million per year for 2026-2028, updates Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data and fee authority, creates an FDA Abraham Accords Office, requires certain generic-drug ingredient sameness disclosures, and increases the Medicare Improvement Fund.

Who Benefits and How

Children with cancer, children with rare diseases, pediatric oncologists, NIH pediatric study networks, generic drug manufacturers, transplant candidates, hospitals, organ procurement organizations, transplant centers, Abraham Accords country regulators, medical product manufacturers in Abraham Accords countries, Medicare policymakers, and FDA reviewers gain clearer authorities, funding, data, or regulatory pathways. Pediatric patients benefit when drug sponsors must generate clinically meaningful pediatric data. Generic applicants benefit when FDA can disclose which inactive ingredients prevent a product from being qualitatively or quantitatively the same as the reference drug. Transplant patients benefit from electronic referral, EHR access, and dashboard transparency.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Brand-name pharmaceutical sponsors, biologics sponsors, orphan-drug holders, FDA review divisions, FDA pediatric and PREA enforcement staff, the Comptroller General, NIH program administrators, OPTN members, hospitals, organ procurement organizations, transplant centers, FDA international-affairs staff, and generic-application reviewers must conduct additional studies, respond to noncompliance letters, report penalties, evaluate voucher effectiveness, operate transplant-network data tools, collect registration fees, stand up the Abraham Accords Office, disclose formulation sameness information, and administer revised Medicare Improvement Fund amounts.

Key Provisions

  • Expands FDA pediatric oncology study authority to require molecularly targeted pediatric cancer investigations involving combinations with standard-of-care or same-sponsor adult cancer drugs.
  • Requires pediatric studies to yield clinically meaningful pediatric data on dosing, safety, preliminary efficacy, and age-appropriate formulations.
  • Requires noncompliance letters, 45-day responses, due-diligence review, and PREA penalty reporting before certain pediatric-study enforcement actions.
  • Extends rare pediatric disease priority review voucher authority through September 30, 2029 and requires a GAO study of voucher effectiveness, unmet need, company size, voucher value, and use timing.
  • Narrows orphan-drug exclusivity from the same disease or condition to the same approved use or indication.
  • Appropriates $25 million per year for 2026 through 2028 for NIH pediatric studies of drugs.
  • Requires OPTN support for electronic health record integration, automated hospital referrals, remote OPO access to donor records, transplant dashboards, and member registration fees.
  • Establishes an FDA Abraham Accords Office to provide regulatory technical assistance, select a location in an Abraham Accords country, and report to Congress.
  • Requires FDA to disclose inactive-ingredient sameness information to certain generic-drug applicants and increases the Medicare Improvement Fund.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Updates pediatric drug-development authorities, rare pediatric disease priority review vouchers, orphan-drug exclusivity, NIH pediatric study funding, organ transplant network operations, FDA Abraham Accords cooperation, generic-drug application transparency, and the Medicare Improvement Fund.

Key Policy Areas

Health Care, Drug Regulation, Pediatrics, Transplants, Medicare

Primary Purpose

Updates pediatric drug-development authorities, rare pediatric disease priority review vouchers, orphan-drug exclusivity, NIH pediatric study funding, organ transplant network operations, FDA Abraham Accords cooperation, generic-drug application transparency, and the Medicare Improvement Fund.

Policy Domains

Health Care Drug Regulation Pediatrics Transplants Medicare

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Children with cancer
  • Children with rare diseases
  • Pediatric oncologists
  • NIH pediatric study networks
  • Generic drug manufacturers
  • Transplant candidates
  • Organ procurement organizations
  • Transplant centers
  • Abraham Accords country regulators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: eh
Transplant centers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Children with cancer: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Pediatric oncologists: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Transplant candidates: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Generic drug manufacturers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Children with rare diseases: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
NIH pediatric study networks: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Organ procurement organizations: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Abraham Accords country regulators: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Brand-name pharmaceutical sponsors
  • Biologics sponsors
  • Orphan-drug holders
  • FDA review divisions
  • Comptroller General
  • NIH program administrators
  • OPTN members
  • Hospitals
  • FDA international-affairs staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: eh
Hospitals: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
OPTN members: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Biologics sponsors: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comptroller General: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Orphan-drug holders: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
FDA review divisions: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
NIH program administrators: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
FDA international-affairs staff: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Brand-name pharmaceutical sponsors: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 2, 2025

Received in the Senate.

Dec 1, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Dec 1, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …

Dec 1, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …

Dec 1, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Dec 1, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …

Dec 1, 2025

Mr. Carter (GA) moved to suspend the rules and pass …

Oct 31, 2025

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 304.

Oct 31, 2025

Additional sponsors: Mr. Wittman, Mr. Allen, Mr. Zinke, Mr. Evans …

Oct 31, 2025

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
66 mentions across 40 clauses
+15 positive -51 negative

Comptroller General, Congressional health committees, FDA Abraham Accords Office

Positive-direction: Congressional health committees, Medicare Improvement Fund, Medicare policymakers, NIH pediatric drug studies program

Negative-direction: Comptroller General, FDA Abraham Accords Office, FDA pediatric enforcement staff, Federal health budget planners, Food and Drug Administration

Pharmaceuticals
61 mentions across 38 clauses
+33 positive -28 negative

Biologics sponsors, Brand-name cancer drug sponsors, Follow-on rare disease drug developers

Positive-direction: Follow-on rare disease drug developers, Generic drug applicants, Generic drug manufacturers, Medical product manufacturers in Abraham Accords countries, Rare pediatric disease drug developers, Sponsors of discontinued drug products

Negative-direction: Biologics sponsors, Brand-name cancer drug sponsors, Orphan-drug exclusivity holders, Pharmaceutical sponsors with PREA duties, Pharmaceutical sponsors with PREA penalties, Reference drug sponsors

Healthcare
20 mentions across 10 clauses
+5 positive -15 negative

Hospitals, Organ procurement organizations, Pediatric oncologists

Positive-direction: Pediatric oncologists

Negative-direction: Hospitals, Organ procurement organizations, Transplant centers

Healthcare Beneficiaries
19 mentions across 19 clauses
+19 positive

Children needing pediatric drug data, Children with cancer, Children with rare diseases

Foreign Entities
10 mentions across 10 clauses
+10 positive

Abraham Accords country regulators

Technology
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

Health IT vendors

Research & Science
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

Pediatric researchers

12/12
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Health Care Drug Regulation Pediatrics Transplants Medicare
Actor Mappings
"optn"
→ Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.
"prea"
→ Pediatric Research Equity Act pediatric-study authority.
"abraham_office"
→ FDA office for regulatory cooperation in an Abraham Accords country.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology