HR1240-119

In Committee

National Statistics on Deadly Force Transparency Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Feb 12, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The National Statistics on Deadly Force Transparency Act creates a federal framework for collecting data on law enforcement use of deadly force. Within six months, the Attorney General must issue regulations, after consulting law enforcement, community, professional, research, and civil rights stakeholders, requiring data collection for all uses of deadly force by federal, state, or local officers. The data must include characteristics of the target and officer, date, time, location, alleged criminal activity, nature of force including firearm use, and any officer explanation. The bill protects names and identifying information from public release, most disclosure, and FOIA. It enforces compliance by reducing a state or local government's Byrne JAG grant by 10 percent in the next fiscal year after substantial reporting failure.

Who Benefits and How

Civil rights researchers benefit from more consistent national data on police use of deadly force. Communities affected by deadly force benefit from transparency about patterns, demographics, locations, and explanations. The Attorney General benefits from regulatory authority to standardize deadly-force reporting. Congressional oversight committees benefit from comparable data across federal, state, and local law enforcement.

Who Bears the Burden and How

State law enforcement agencies must collect and report deadly-force data under federal regulations. Local police departments risk a 10 percent Byrne JAG grant reduction for substantial reporting failures. Justice Department statisticians must compile sensitive data while protecting names and identifying information. Law enforcement officers may face greater public scrutiny even though identifying information is not publicly released.

Key Provisions

  • Requires Attorney General regulations for collecting data on every use of deadly force by federal, state, or local officers.
  • Requires data on demographics, location, alleged criminal activity, nature of force, firearm use, and officer explanations.
  • Protects names and identifying information from public release, most disclosure, and FOIA.
  • Reduces Byrne JAG grants by 10 percent for substantial state or local reporting failures.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires Attorney General regulations for national deadly-force data collection, protects identifying information from public release, and reduces Byrne JAG grants by 10 percent for substantial reporting failures.

Key Policy Areas

Public Safety, Civil Rights, Law Enforcement

Primary Purpose

Requires Attorney General regulations for national deadly-force data collection, protects identifying information from public release, and reduces Byrne JAG grants by 10 percent for substantial reporting failures.

Policy Domains

Public Safety Civil Rights Law Enforcement

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Civil rights researchers
  • Communities affected by deadly force
  • Attorney General
  • Congressional oversight committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Attorney General: , ,
Civil rights researchers: , ,
Congressional oversight committees: , ,
Communities affected by deadly force: , ,
Identified Costs
  • State law enforcement agencies
  • Local police departments
  • Justice Department statisticians
  • Law enforcement officers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Law enforcement officers: , ,
Local police departments: , ,
State law enforcement agencies: , ,
Justice Department statisticians: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 12, 2025

Mr. Cohen introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Feb 12, 2025

Introduced in House

Feb 12, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Advocacy Groups
3 mentions across 3 clauses
?3 uncertain

Civil rights researchers

General Public
3 mentions across 3 clauses
?3 uncertain

Communities affected by deadly force

Law Enforcement
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Local police departments

Government Employees
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Justice Department statisticians

3/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Public Safety Civil Rights Law Enforcement

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology