HR1166-119

Passed House

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from procuring certain foreign-made batteries, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Mar 11, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

Prohibits the Department of Homeland Security from procuring batteries from specified Chinese manufacturers and certain entities tied to forced labor or Chinese military company lists, beginning on October 1, 2027.

Who Benefits and How

Domestic and allied battery suppliers and national security officials could benefit from reduced DHS dependence on adversary-linked battery supply chains.

Who Bears the Burden and How

DHS must shift procurement away from covered suppliers, and affected Chinese manufacturers lose access to DHS purchasing opportunities.

Key Provisions

  • Bars DHS procurement of batteries from named Chinese manufacturers.
  • Extends the prohibition to entities on forced labor and Chinese military company lists.
  • Sets a future effective date to allow procurement transition.
  • Uses procurement restrictions to reduce adversary-linked supply chain exposure.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Prohibits the Department of Homeland Security from procuring batteries from specified Chinese manufacturers and certain entities tied to forced labor or Chinese military company lists, beginning on October 1, 2027.

Key Policy Areas

National Security, Procurement Policy, Supply Chain Security

Primary Purpose

Prohibits the Department of Homeland Security from procuring batteries from specified Chinese manufacturers and certain entities tied to forced labor or Chinese military company lists, beginning on October 1, 2027.

Policy Domains

National Security Procurement Policy Supply Chain Security

Main Provisions

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Domestic and allied battery suppliers and agencies focused on supply chain security
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: eh

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • DHS procurement officials and covered foreign suppliers excluded from future contracts
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: eh

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 11, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland …

Mar 11, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Feb 10, 2025

Mr. Gimenez (for himself, Mr. Green of Tennessee, Mr. Moolenaar, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
9 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -8 negative

Coast Guard, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Department of Homeland Security procurement offices

Positive-direction: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

Negative-direction: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security procurement offices, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers, Transportation Security Administration, US Customs and Border Protection, Border Patrol, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations, United States Secret Service

Energy
3 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive -1 negative

Chinese battery manufacturers (CATL, BYD, Envision Energy, EVE Energy, Gotion High-tech, Hithium), Domestic battery manufacturers and allied-nation suppliers, US-based battery manufacturers

Positive-direction: Domestic battery manufacturers and allied-nation suppliers, US-based battery manufacturers

Negative-direction: Chinese battery manufacturers (CATL, BYD, Envision Energy, EVE Energy, Gotion High-tech, Hithium)

Defense
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

Chinese military companies (DoD-identified), National security stakeholders

Positive-direction: National security stakeholders

Negative-direction: Chinese military companies (DoD-identified)

Education
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

Entities on Commerce export control lists (15 CFR Part 744 Supplement 4), Entities on Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act lists

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Taxpayers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
National Security Procurement Policy Supply Chain Security

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology