HR1118-119

Reported

Value Over Cost Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Feb 7, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Value Over Cost Act changes federal multiple award schedule procurement rules in title 41 and title 10. Current procedures focus on orders and contracts resulting in the lowest overall cost alternative. The bill allows those procedures to result either in the lowest overall cost alternative or, when the Administrator of General Services determines that obtaining best value as described in Federal Acquisition Regulation section 15.101 is necessary to promote the best interests of the federal government, obtaining the best value to meet federal needs. Parallel language is added for defense procurement references, using best value to meet the needs of the United States.

Who Benefits and How

Federal agencies buying through multiple award schedules benefit because they can prioritize best value when GSA determines that lowest cost alone does not meet federal needs. Contractors offering higher-quality, more technically capable, or lower-risk products and services benefit because best value can consider more than price. The General Services Administration benefits from explicit authority to approve best-value use under FAR 15.101. Defense procurement customers benefit from parallel title 10 language. Taxpayers benefit if best-value choices reduce lifecycle risk, performance failures, or poor-quality purchasing despite higher upfront prices.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Administrator of General Services must determine when best value is necessary and justify use of FAR 15.101 concepts. Contracting officers must document and apply best-value tradeoffs rather than relying solely on lowest cost. Lowest-price vendors may lose some advantage when agencies use best value. Procurement oversight staff must monitor whether best-value determinations are used appropriately. Agencies may face more evaluation complexity when nonprice factors are weighed.

Key Provisions

  • Amends title 41 multiple award schedule procedures.
  • Amends parallel title 10 defense procurement procedures.
  • Preserves the lowest overall cost alternative as one permissible result.
  • Allows best value when the GSA Administrator determines it is necessary for federal interests.
  • Incorporates the Federal Acquisition Regulation section 15.101 concept of best value.
  • Gives agencies room to weigh quality, technical merit, and risk when authorized.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Allows the Administrator of General Services to use best value, as described in Federal Acquisition Regulation section 15.101, instead of only lowest overall cost for multiple award schedule orders and contracts when the Administrator determines best value is necessary to promote the federal government's interests.

Key Policy Areas

Procurement, Government Contracting

Primary Purpose

Allows the Administrator of General Services to use best value, as described in Federal Acquisition Regulation section 15.101, instead of only lowest overall cost for multiple award schedule orders and contracts when the Administrator determines best value is necessary to promote the federal government's interests.

Policy Domains

Procurement Government Contracting

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Federal agencies using multiple award schedules
  • Higher-quality contractors
  • General Services Administration
  • Defense procurement customers
  • Taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Administrator of General Services
  • Contracting officers
  • Lowest-price vendors
  • Procurement oversight staff
  • Federal agencies evaluating offers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 5, 2026

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …

Feb 4, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Feb 7, 2025

Mr. Donalds (for himself and Mr. Moskowitz) introduced the following …

Feb 7, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and …

Feb 7, 2025

Introduced in House

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Procurement Government Contracting
Actor Mappings
"gsa"
→ General Services Administration
"administrator"
→ Administrator of General Services

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology