HR1106-119

In Committee

Scientific Integrity Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 6, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Scientific Integrity Act rewrites section 1009 of the America COMPETES Act. It requires each covered agency head, within 90 days, to adopt and enforce a scientific integrity policy and submit it to the Office of Science and Technology Policy for approval. Approved policies must be posted publicly and sent to Congress. The policy must prohibit research misconduct, suppression or alteration of scientific findings, interference with communication of science, intimidation, censorship, and certain conflicts. Existing agency policies can satisfy the requirement if the agency head determines they meet the new standards and OSTP approves.

Who Benefits and How

Federal scientists benefit from enforceable protections against suppression, alteration, interference, and retaliation involving scientific findings. Public health and environmental policymakers benefit from more reliable access to federal scientific evidence. Research integrity advocates benefit from agency-wide rules against fraud, deceit, coercive manipulation, and political interference. Congressional science committees benefit from receiving approved policies and written determinations for existing policies.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Covered agency heads must adopt, enforce, publish, and submit scientific integrity policies on tight timelines. OSTP must review and approve agency policies and existing-policy determinations. Agency political officials and managers face limits on suppressing or altering scientific communication. Federal research offices must document compliance, train staff, and handle integrity complaints.

Key Provisions

  • Requires covered agencies to adopt and enforce scientific integrity policies within 90 days.
  • Requires OSTP approval, public posting, and submission to Congress.
  • Prohibits misconduct, suppression, alteration, interference, intimidation, censorship, and politicized manipulation of federal science.
  • Allows existing policies to satisfy the law only after written agency determination and OSTP approval.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires covered federal agencies to adopt, enforce, publish, and obtain OSTP approval for scientific integrity policies that prevent suppression, distortion, misconduct, and political interference in federal science.

Key Policy Areas

Science, Federal Agencies, Government Ethics

Primary Purpose

Requires covered federal agencies to adopt, enforce, publish, and obtain OSTP approval for scientific integrity policies that prevent suppression, distortion, misconduct, and political interference in federal science.

Policy Domains

Science Federal Agencies Government Ethics

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Federal agency researchers
  • Public health agencies
  • Research integrity advocates
  • Congressional science committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Public health agencies: , ,
Federal agency researchers: , ,
Research integrity advocates: , ,
Congressional science committees: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Covered federal agencies
  • Office of Science and Technology Policy
  • Agency political officials
  • Federal research offices
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Covered federal agencies: , ,
Federal research offices: , ,
Agency political officials: , ,
Office of Science and Technology Policy: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 6, 2025

Mr. Tonko (for himself, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Beyer, Ms. Bonamici, …

Feb 6, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Feb 6, 2025

Introduced in House

Feb 6, 2025

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H543-544)

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
6 mentions across 3 clauses
-6 negative

Covered agency heads, OSTP

Research & Science
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Federal scientists

General Public
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Public health policymakers

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Science Federal Agencies Government Ethics

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology