No Censors on our Shores Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The No Censors on our Shores Act amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to target foreign government officials who censor U.S. citizens in the United States. It adds a new inadmissibility ground for any alien who, while serving as an official of a foreign government, was responsible for or directly carried out an act against a U.S. citizen located in the United States that would violate the First Amendment if a U.S. government official committed the act in the United States. It adds a parallel deportability ground for the same conduct. The bill does not create a general First Amendment civil claim; it uses immigration consequences to exclude or remove foreign officials tied to censorship of U.S. citizens.
Who Benefits and How
U.S. citizens targeted by foreign-government censorship benefit because the bill creates immigration consequences for foreign officials responsible for censorship acts against them. Free-speech advocates benefit from a tool aimed at foreign officials who pressure, punish, or suppress speech inside the United States. Immigration officers benefit from explicit inadmissibility and deportability grounds tied to First Amendment-like conduct. The Department of State and Department of Homeland Security benefit from a statutory basis to deny visas, deny admission, or pursue removal for covered foreign officials. Diaspora communities in the United States benefit if foreign officials are deterred from transnational censorship.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Foreign government officials who censor U.S. citizens face visa denial, inadmissibility, and deportation risk. Foreign governments may face diplomatic friction when their officials are excluded or removed. DHS and State Department adjudicators must determine whether the official's conduct against a U.S. citizen would violate the First Amendment if committed by a U.S. official. Covered foreign officials already in the United States may face removal proceedings.
Key Provisions
- Adds an inadmissibility ground for foreign government officials responsible for censorship acts against U.S. citizens in the United States.
- Adds a deportability ground for the same foreign-official censorship conduct.
- Uses a First Amendment counterfactual test to define covered acts.
- Applies only to conduct committed while serving as a foreign government official.
- Protects U.S. citizens from transnational censorship by linking it to immigration consequences.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Makes foreign government officials inadmissible and deportable if, while serving as foreign officials, they were responsible for or directly carried out acts against U.S. citizens in the United States that would violate the First Amendment if done by U.S. officials.
Key Policy Areas
Immigration, Civil Rights, Foreign Affairs
Primary Purpose
Makes foreign government officials inadmissible and deportable if, while serving as foreign officials, they were responsible for or directly carried out acts against U.S. citizens in the United States that would violate the First Amendment if done by U.S. officials.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- U.S. citizens targeted by foreign-government censorship
- Free-speech advocates
- Immigration officers
- Department of State
- Department of Homeland Security
- Diaspora communities
Identified Costs
- Foreign government officials who censor U.S. citizens
- Foreign governments
- DHS adjudicators
- State Department adjudicators
- Covered foreign officials in the United States
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedPlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 523.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-603.
Additional sponsors: Mr. Hunt and Mr. Cline
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 523.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mr. Issa (for himself, Ms. Salazar, Mr. Gill of Texas, …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Free-speech advocates, U.S. citizens targeted by foreign-government censorship
Department of State, Foreign government officials who censor U.S. citizens
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "dhs"
- → Department of Homeland Security
- "state"
- → Department of State
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology