To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that amounts paid for an abortion are not taken into account for purposes of the deduction for medical expenses.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill requires amounts paid for abortion not taken into account in determining deduction for medical expenses Section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection. It relies on tax deductions and compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Healthcare Consumers and Healthcare.
Who Benefits and How
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face reduced risk.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties and Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Requires amounts paid for abortion not taken into account in determining deduction for medical expenses Section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill requires amounts paid for abortion not taken into account in determining deduction for medical expenses Section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection.
Key Policy Areas
Healthcare Consumers, Healthcare
Primary Purpose
The bill requires amounts paid for abortion not taken into account in determining deduction for medical expenses Section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
- Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology