HR10135-118

Introduced

To improve the quality, appropriateness, and effectiveness of diagnosis in health care, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Nov 15, 2024

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Improving Diagnosis in Medicine Act of 2024 creates a multi-pronged federal initiative to reduce diagnostic errors in healthcare. It establishes a research program at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), creates diagnostic excellence research centers, expands fellowship and training opportunities, develops quality measures for diagnostic accuracy, convenes expert panels on data standardization, creates an interagency coordinating council, and commissions a National Academies report on diagnostic disparities.

Who Benefits and How

Patients benefit from improved diagnostic accuracy and reduced medical errors, which are a leading cause of harm in healthcare. Researchers and academic medical centers benefit from new funding streams totaling up to $45 million per year for diagnostic safety research. Healthcare providers benefit from better tools, training, and evidence-based practices for making accurate diagnoses. Underserved communities benefit from a specific focus on identifying and eliminating diagnostic disparities.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal taxpayers fund the program through authorized appropriations of $30-45 million annually for research (2025-2029), plus $1.5 million annually for the interagency council and $1.5 million for the National Academies study. Multiple federal agencies must dedicate personnel to serve on the interagency council. AHRQ bears the primary administrative burden of establishing and managing the new programs.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes $30-45 million annually (FY2025-2029) for a diagnostic safety research program at AHRQ
  • Creates Research Centers of Diagnostic Excellence linking academic institutions with clinical practice
  • Establishes an Interagency Council on Improving Diagnosis with members from CDC, CMS, VA, DOD, NIH, and other agencies
  • Commissions a National Academies study on disparities in diagnostic safety across race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and other factors
  • Expands Ruth Kirschstein fellowship awards to include diagnostic safety research

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Establishes a comprehensive federal program to improve diagnostic safety and quality in healthcare, including research funding, training grants, quality measure development, standardized data initiatives, an interagency council, and a National Academies report on diagnostic disparities.

Key Policy Areas

Healthcare, Science & Technology

Primary Purpose

Establishes a comprehensive federal program to improve diagnostic safety and quality in healthcare, including research funding, training grants, quality measure development, standardized data initiatives, an interagency council, and a National Academies report on diagnostic disparities.

Policy Domains

Healthcare Science & Technology

Whole Bill

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Patients
  • Healthcare researchers and academic medical centers
  • Healthcare providers
  • Underserved communities
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Federal taxpayers
  • AHRQ
  • Federal agencies on the interagency council
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Nov 15, 2024

Mr. Beyer (for himself, Mr. Van Drew, and Ms. Schrier) …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Research & Science
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

Diagnostic research community, Healthcare research institutions, Medical researchers in diagnostic safety

Government
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+2 positive -2 negative

AHRQ, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS and participating agencies

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: AHRQ

Negative-direction: HHS and participating agencies

Manufacturing
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Healthcare diagnostic technology companies

Education
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Medical schools and teaching hospitals

Healthcare
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Healthcare providers

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Health IT companies

6/8
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Healthcare Science & Technology
Actor Mappings
"the_director"
→ Director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Health and Human Services

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology